Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Type III restriction enzymes need two inversely oriented recognition sites for DNA cleavage

Abstract

TYPE III restriction/modification enzymes recognize short, non-palindromic sequences that can be methylated on only one strand, with the paradoxical consequence that during replication of what is in effect hemimethylated DNA totally unmodified sites arise1. Why the unmodified sites are not subject to suicidal restriction was not clear. Here we show that restriction requires two unmodified recognition sites that can be separated by different distances but which must be in inverse orientation. All of the unmodified sites in newly replicated DNA are of course in the same orientation, which explains why they are not restricted. This result may be of relevance to other manifestations of anisotropy in double-stranded DNA, such as genetic imprinting2.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bickle, T. A. in Nucleases (eds Linn, S. M. & Roberts, R. J.) 85–108 (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Klar, A. J. S. Nature 326, 466–470 (1987).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Schroeder, C., Jurkschat, H., Meisel, A., Reich, J. G. & Krüger, D. H. Gene 45, 77–86 (1986).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Krüger, D. H., Bickle, T. A., Reuter, M., Pein, C. D. & Schroeder, C. in Nucleic Acid Methylation (eds Clawson, G. A., Willis, D. B., Weissbach, A. & Jones, P. A.) 113–124 (Liss, New York, 1990).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Hadi, S. M. et al. J. molec. Biol. 134, 655–666 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van Wezenbeck, P. M. G. F., Hulsebos, T. J. M. & Schoenmakers, J. G. G. Gene 11, 129–148 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Sambrook, J., Fritsch, E. F. & Maniatis, T. Molecular Cloning: A Laboratory Manual 2nd edn (Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory Press, New York, 1989).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hadi, S. M., Bächi, B., Iida, S. & Bickle, T. A. J. molec. Biol. 165, 19–34 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Reiser, J. & Yuan, R. J. biol. Chem. 252, 451–456 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Meisel, A., Krüger, D. H. & Bickle, T. A. Nucleic Acids Res. 19, 3997 (1991).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Vandeyar, M. A., Weiner, M. P., Hutton, C. J. & Batt, C. A. Gene 65, 129–133 (1988).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Tabor, S. & Richardson, C. C. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 86, 4076–4080 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Meisel, A., Bickle, T., Kriiger, D. et al. Type III restriction enzymes need two inversely oriented recognition sites for DNA cleavage. Nature 355, 467–469 (1992). https://doi.org/10.1038/355467a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/355467a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing