Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Young ages of two diogenites and their genetic implications

Abstract

THE achondrite meteorites known as eucrites and diogenites are thought to be igneous rocks derived from the crust and mantle, respectively, of a common parent planet or asteroid1,2. Several eucrites have been dated at 4.5–4.6 Gyr by the Rb–Sr method4–6, and a Rb–Sr age of 4.45±0.18 Gyr (λ = 1.42x 10−11yr−1) has been reported3 for three diogenites. From these data, one cannot judge whether diogenites and eucrites are the same age. Here we present precise Rb–Sr data for two diogenites (Tatahouine and Johnstown) that yield an age of 4.394 ±0.011 Gyr—significantly younger than our age of 4.52 ±0.15 Gyr for the Juvinas eucrite. The low initial 87Sr/86Sr ratio of these diogenites, and their rare-earth element abundance patterns, are inconsistent with the interpretation that the young ages reflect secondary metamorphism. We suggest that our data raise doubts about a genetically close relationship between eucrites and these diogenites, and that there exist groups of diogenites that are genetically distinct from one another. Our results also suggest that igneous activity in the assumed parent body continued for about one hundred million years after its formation 4.52 Gyr ago. The parent body may thus have had a complicated evolutionary history.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mason, B. Am. Sci. 55, 429–455 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Clayton, R. N., Onuma, N. & Mayeda, T. K. Earth planet Sci. Lett. 30, 10–18 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Birck, J. L. & Allègre, C. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 55, 116–122 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Allègre, C. J., Birck, J. L., Fourcade, S. & Semet, M. P. Science 187, 436–438 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nyquist, L. E. et al. J. geophys. Res. 91, 8137–8150 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Birck, J. L. & Allègre, C. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 39, 37–51 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Takeda, H. & Mori, H. Meteoritics 16, 390–391 (1981).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Consolmagno, G. J. Icarus 70, 522–530 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Papanastassiou, D. A. & Wasserburg, G. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 5, 361–376 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Takahashi, K., Masudat, A. Young ages of two diogenites and their genetic implications. Nature 343, 540–542 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/343540a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/343540a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing