Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Evaluation of an acidification model with data from manipulated catchments in Norway

Abstract

INTERNATIONAL efforts to control the emissions of the acidifying compounds SO2 and NOx to the atmosphere, and to establish critical loads, are in part aimed at predicting the long-term response of soils and waters to changes in acid deposition. Estimation of future long-term trends in acidification requires the use of models, the strict verification of which requires years or decades to determine whether predictions match observed responses. Experimental manipulations with whole ecosystems provide data with which predictive models can be evaluated. The MAGIC model1,2 is a widely used, intermediate-complexity, process-oriented model for soil and water acidification in catchments. Here we follow up a preliminary application3of the model to the first two years of data from the manipulated catchments of the RAIN (Reversible Acidification In Norway) project4. We use a more extensive four-year data set as inputs to a new version of the model. The four-year record provides a much more rigorous test of the predictive ability of the model because these data show major changes in runoff chemistry due to the experimental change in deposition. Sensitivity analysis shows that MAGIC is successful at predicting future acidification.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cosby, G. J. et al. Wat. Resour. Res. 21, 51–63 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cosby, G. J. et al. Wat. Resour. Res. 21, 1591–1601 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Wright, R. F. & Cosby, B. J. Atmos. Envir. 21, 727–730 (1987).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wright, R. F. et al. Nature 334, 670–675 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lotse, E. & Otabbong, E. Acid Rain Res. Rep. 8/85 (Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, 1985).

  6. Lotse, E. Acid Rain Res. Rep. 18/89 (Norwegian Institute for Water Research, Oslo, 1989).

  7. Bettelheim, J. & Littler, A. CEGB Rep. PL-GS/E/1/79 (Central Elect. Generating Board, London, 1979).

  8. Wright, R. F. et al. Nature 334, 422–424 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Frogner, T. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta (in the press).

  10. Wright, R. F. Wat Air Soil Pollut. (in the press).

  11. Wright, R. F. et al. Wat. Air Soil Pollut 30, 367–380 (1986).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Neal, C. et al. Nature 334, 109–110 (1988).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hornberger, G. M., Cosby, B. J. & Wright, R. F. Wat. Resour. Res. 25, 2009–2018 (1989).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Wright, R., Cosby, B., Flaten, M. et al. Evaluation of an acidification model with data from manipulated catchments in Norway. Nature 343, 53–55 (1990). https://doi.org/10.1038/343053a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/343053a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing