Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Testing the completeness of earthquake catalogues and the hypothesis of self-similarity

Abstract

Self-similarity of the earthquake process is consistent with the observed linear b-value relation log (N) = a – bM, where N is the number of earthquakes with magnitude M. Deviations from linearity are believed to be due to statistical fluctuations because of the scarcity of events at large M, or from incompleteness because of a detection threshold at small M. Above some magnitude level, all local events are detected, because they exceed the noise background on the seismogram. As magnitude decreases, however, events go undetected as the seismic signal approaches the noise background. Thus more of the smallest events should be logged at night than during the day, because the cultural noise sources and winds are diminished at night, resulting in presumably quieter seismograms. Here we use this day-to-night noise modulation to develop a completeness test for earthquake catalogues; catalogues that indicate no significant modulation are considered complete. We test three catalogues and show that the completeness magnitude can be different from the magnitude at which the b-value departs from linearity. In particular, catalogues that show significant deviations in linearity at small M but are otherwise complete, are at odds with the hypothesis of earthquake self-similarity.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Schuster, A. Proc. R. Soc. Lond. 61, 455–465 (1897).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Gardner, J. K. & Knopoff, L. Bull. seismol. Soc. Am. 64, 1363–1367 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Young, D. & Zürn, W. J. Geophys. 45, 171–182 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. McNutt, S. R. & Beavan, R. J. Nature 294, 615–618 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Melchior, P. The Tides and the Planet Earth (Pergamon, Oxford, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Taylor, D. thesis, Virginia Polytechnic Inst., Blacksburg, Virginia (1988).

  7. Taylor, D., Snoke, J. A., Sacks, I. S. & Takanami, T. Seismol. Res. Lett. 58, 105 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Rydelek, P., Sacks, I. Testing the completeness of earthquake catalogues and the hypothesis of self-similarity. Nature 337, 251–253 (1989). https://doi.org/10.1038/337251a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/337251a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing