Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Aftershocks of deep earthquakes do not occur preferentially on nodal planes of focal mechanisms

Abstract

Some earthquakes with focal depths exceeding 70 km possess one or more aftershocks which are well recorded by stations at teleseis-mic distances. Precise determination of relative vectors separating the aftershocks and 60 initial events finds the vector directions are distributed uniformly with respect to the nodal plane of main shock focal mechanisms. When focal mechanisms are available for both an initial event and an aftershock, the mechanisms are occasionally significantly different from one another. These results suggest that the failure process of deep earthquakes is not slip occurring along a simple, planar surface. Our results contradict several previous analyses of aftershocks because other investigators did not recognize that half of the focal sphere lies within 16° of one of the nodal planes.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Billington, S. & Isacks, B. Geophys. Res. Lett. 2, 63–66 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Billington, S., Isacks, B. & Barazangi, M. Geology 5, 699–704 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Giardini, D. & Woodhouse, J. H. Nature 307, 505–509 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Page, R. J. geophys. Res. 73, 3897–3903 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Kagan, Y. Y. & Knopoff, L. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 70, 1811–1822 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Prozorov, A. G. & Dziewonski, A. M. J. geophys. Res. 87, 2829–2839 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Isacks, B. L., Sykes, L. R. & Oliver, J. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 57, 935–958 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Frohlich, C. J. geophys. Res. 92, (in the press).

  9. Oike, K. Bull. Dis. Prev. Res. Inst. 19, 55–66 (1969).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Oike, K. Bull. Dis. Prev. Res. Inst. 20, 145–182 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Choy, G. L. & Boatwright, J. Bull. seism. Soc. Am., 71, 691–711 (1981).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fukao, Y. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 5, 61–76 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Chung, W. & Kanamori, H. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 13, 85–96 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Furumoto, M. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 15, 1–12 (1977).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Koyama, J. Phys. Earth planet. Inter. 16, 307–317 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Sasatani, T. J. Fac. Sci. Hokkaido Univ. Geophys. 6, 301–384 (1980).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Rakers, E. & Muller, G. J. Geophys. 50, 143 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Brustle, W. & Muller, G. Bull. seism. Soc. Am. 77, 47–68 (1987).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Koyama, J. Sci. Rep. Tohoku Univ. Geophys. 23, 83–101 (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Oike, K. Bull. Dis. Prev. Res. Inst. 21, 153–178 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Cox, D. R. & Lewis, P. A. W. The Statistical Analysis of a Series of Events 150 (Chapman & Hall, London, 1966).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  22. Heard, H. C. in Rock Deformation, Geol., Soc. Am. Mem. 79, (eds Griggs, D. & Handin J.) 193–226 (Waverly, Baltimore, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  23. Orowan, E. in Rock Deformation, Geol. Soc. Am. Mem. 79, (eds Griggs, D. & Handin, J.) 323–345 (Waverly, Baltimore, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Griggs, D. T. & Baker, D. W. in Properties of Matter Under Unusual Conditions in (ed. Mark, H.) 23–42 (Interscience, New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Dmowska, R. & Rice, J. R. in Continuum Theories and Solid Earth Physics (ed. Teisseyre, R.) (Elsevier, New York, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Silver, P. G. & Jordan, T. H. Geophys. J. 70, 755–787 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  27. Hinzen, K. J. Geophys. 59, 112–120 (1986).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Isacks, B. & Molnar, P. Rev. Geophys. Space Phys. 9, 103–174 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Schneider, J. F. thesis, Univ. Wisconsin, Madison (1984).

  30. Reasenberg, P. & Oppenheimer, D. US Geol. Surv. Open-File Rep. No. 85-739 (US Geological Survey, Menlo Park, 1986).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Frohlich, C., Willemann, R. Aftershocks of deep earthquakes do not occur preferentially on nodal planes of focal mechanisms . Nature 329, 41–42 (1987). https://doi.org/10.1038/329041a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/329041a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing