Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Sex-ratio manipulation in the common opossum

Abstract

The idea that offspring sex ratio is affected by parental capacity for reproductive investment was first developed by Trivers and Willard1 and later elaborated by others2–6. According to this hypothesis, if the amount of parental investment7 differentially affects the expected reproductive success of offspring depending on offspring gender, then parents capable of exceptionally large investment should bias reproductive investment toward the sex affected most. For most polygynous mammals, male reproductive success is expected to be most enhanced by exceptionally large investment1,8, but observational field studies and laboratory experiments have either supported9–13 or contradicted3,14–16 this conditional sex-allocation hypothesis. We have performed the first experimental field study specifically to examine this hypothesis, and find that the female common opossum (Didelphis marsupialis), whose capacity for parental investment was artificially enhanced by dietary supplementation, produces male-biased sex ratios, in contrast to the unbiased ratios produced by control females.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Trivers, R. L. & Willard, D. E. Science 179, 90–92 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Williams, G. C. Proc. R. Soc. B205, 567–580 (1979).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Altmann, J. Baboon Mothers and Infants (Harvard University Press, 1980).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fiala, K. L. Evolution 35, 898–911 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Okansen, L. Am. Nat. 117, 109–111 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Charnov, E. L. The Theory of Sex Allocation (Princeton University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Trivers, R. L. in Sexual Selection and the Descent of Man 1871–1971 (ed. Campbell, B.) 136–179 (Aldine, Chicago, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Clutton-Brock, T. H. & Albon, S.D. in Current Problems in Sociobiology (ed. King's College Sociobiology Group) 223–247 (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Rivers, J. P. W. & Crawford, M. A. Nature 252, 297–298 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. McClure, P. A. Science 211, 1058–1060 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gosling, L. M. & Petrie, M. in Physiological Ecology (eds Calow, P. & Townsend, C. R.) 315–345 (Blackwell Scientific, Oxford, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D. & Guinness, F. E. Nature 308, 358–360 (1984)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Rutberg, A. T. Am. Nat. 127, 89–94 (1986).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Verme, L. J. J. Wildl. Mngt. 47, 573–582 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Simpson, M. J. & Simpson, A. E. Nature 300, 440–441 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Silk, J. B. Am. Nat. 121, 56–66 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Sunquist, M. E., Austad, S. N. & Sunquist, F. J. Mammal. (in the press).

  18. Petrides, G. A. J. Mammal. 30, 364–378 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Reynolds, H. C. Univ. Calif. Publs Zool. 52, 223–284 (1952).

    Google Scholar 

  20. Gardner, A. L. in Wild Mammals of North America (eds Chapman, J. A. & Feldhamer, G. A.) 3–36 (Johns Hopkins University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  21. Reiter, J., Stinson, N.L. & LeBoeuf, B.J. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 3, 337–367 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dittus, W. P. J. Behaviour 69, 265–301 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Maynard Smith, J. Behav. Ecol. Sociobiol. 7, 247–257 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Geist, V. Mountain Sheep (University of Chicago Press, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Guinness, F. E. & Albon, S. D. Red Deer: Behaviour and Ecology of Two Sexes (Cambridge University Press, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Fleming, T. H. J. Mammal. 55, 543–561 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Kaufmann, J. H. Am. Zool. 14, 51–62 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Johnson, C. N. Austral. Wildl. Res. 10, 25–31 (1983).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Myers, J. H. Am. Nat. 112, 381–388 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Clutton-Brock, T. H., Albon, S. D. & Guinness, F. E. Nature 289, 487–489 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Austad, S., Sunquist, M. Sex-ratio manipulation in the common opossum. Nature 324, 58–60 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/324058a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/324058a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing