Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Feasibility of a low-mass binary source progenitor for PSR1937+214

Abstract

One suggested progenitor system for the 1.5–ms pulsar PSR1937+214 is a close binary containing, in the late stages of its evolution, a neutron star and a very-low-mass (0.1 M) degenerate dwarf helium star1,2. The two main questions that affect the plausibility of this scenario are: (1) whether the system's evolution would in fact leave the neutron star at the observed high spin rate; and (2) whether the secondary could be disrupted, leaving a single pulsar. Here, we have analysed such a system using the predictions of Ghosh and Lamb3, and find that the equilibrium rotation period predicted for the neutron star immediately before the disruption of the secondary is so large that matter accreted from a disk after disruption would be unlikely to spin the pulsar up to the observed period. Furthermore, our estimate for the magnitude of tidal torques that transfer rotational angular momentum from an accretion disk back into the orbital motion may give values substantially higher than the previous estimate1;. It is thus unlikely that PSR1937+214 originated in a binary system in which the companion had an extremely low mass at disruption.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ruderman, M. A. & Shaham, J. Nature 304, 425–427 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ruderman, M. A. & Shaham, J. Astrophys. J. 289, 244–246 (1985).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Ghosh, P. & Lamb, F. K. Astrophys. J. 234, 296–316 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Alpar, M. A., Cheng, A. F., Ruderman, M. A. & Shaham, J. Nature 300, 728–730 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Bonsema, P. F. J. & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. Astr. Astrophys. 146, L3–L5 (1985).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. van den Heuvel, E. P. J. & Bonsema, P. T. J. Astr. Astrophys. 139, L16–L18 (1984).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Li, F. K., Joss, P. C., McClintock, J. E., Rappaport, S. & Wright, E. L. Astrophys. J. 240, 628–635 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Vila, S. C. Astrophys. J. 168, 217–223 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Taam, R. E. & Wade, R. A. Astrophys. J. 293, 504–507 (1985).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Henrichs, H. F. in Accretion-Driven Stellar X-ray Sources (eds Lewin, W. H. G. & van den Heuvel, E. P. J.) 393 (Cambridge University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Shapiro, S. L. & Teukolsky, S. A. Black Holes, White Dwarfs and Neutron Stars (Wiley, New York, 1983).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  12. Henrichs, H. F. & van den Heuvel, E. P. J. Nature 303, 213–215 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Hut, P. & Paczynski, B. Astrophys. J. 284, 675–684 (1984).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. van den Heuvel, E. P. J. in Proc. Green Bank Workshop on Millisecond Pulsars (eds Reynolds, S. & Stinebring, D.) 86–103 (National Radio Astronomy Observatory, Green Bank, West Virginia, 1984).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Goldreich, P. & Tremaine, S. Astrophys. J. 233, 857–871 (1979).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jeffrey, L. Feasibility of a low-mass binary source progenitor for PSR1937+214. Nature 319, 384–386 (1986). https://doi.org/10.1038/319384a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/319384a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing