Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Are all the ‘martian’ meteorites from Mars?

Abstract

The shergottites, nakhlites and Chassigny, collectively known as the SNC meteorites, seem to define a petrological and geochemical sequence1. Together with their young radiometric solidification ages of only 1,300 Myr (refs 2–9), this has been interpreted as evidence for magmatic activity on their parent body late in its history. Such late magmatism is most easily envisaged for planetary-sized bodies and it has been suggested that SNC meteorites are derived from Mars (see resf. 10 and refs therein). This suggestion is supported by the apparent similarities between the noble gas and nitrogen composition of the present martian atmosphere11,12 and gases trapped in shock-produced glass phases of the shergottite EETA 79001 (refs 13, 14). Our analyses of trapped argon, krypton and xenon in Shergotty, Nakhla and Chassigny reported here show, however, that these meteorites do not contain unadulterated noble gases from the martian atmosphere, fractionated or not. They indicate that for Nakhla and Chassigny, in particular, a martian origin is only possible if the martian atmosphere contains a higher fraction of radiogenic 129Xe and of fissiogenic xenon than does xenon in martian rocks. This is the opposite of the situation on Earth.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Stolper, E., McSween, H. Y. Jr & Hays, J. F. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 43, 589–602 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Podosek, F. A. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 19, 135–144 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Papanastassiou, D. A. & Wasserburg, G. J. Geophys. Res. Lett. 1, 23–26 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Gale, N. H., Arden, J. W. & Hutchison, R. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 26, 195–206 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Nakamura, N., Unruh, D. M., Tatsumoto, M. & Hutchison, R. Meteoritics 12, 324–325 (1977).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bogard, D. D. & Husain, L. Geophys. Res. Lett. 4, 69–71 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wooden, J. L. et al. Lunar planet. Sci. 10, 1379–1381 (1979).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Bogard, D. D. & Nyquist, L. E. Meteoritics 14, 356 (1979).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Shih, C.-Y. et al. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 46, 2323–2344 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Wood, C. A. & Ashwal, L. D. Proc. lunar planet. Sci. Conf. 12 B, 1359–1375 (1981).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Owen, T. et al. J. geophys. Res. 82, 4635–4639 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Pollack, J. B. & Black, D. C. Icarus 51, 169–198 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bogard, D. D. & Johnson, P. Science 221, 651–654 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Becker, R. H. & Pepin, R. O. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 69, 225–242 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ganapathy, R. & Anders, E. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 33, 775–787 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Prior, G. Mineralog. Mag. 16, 274–291 (1912).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Ozima, M. & Podosek, F.A. Noble Gas Geochemistry (Cambridge University Press, 1983).

    Google Scholar 

  18. Podosek, F. A. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 34, 341–365 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jordan, J., Kirsten, T. & Richter, H. Z. Naturforsch. 35 a, 145–170 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Anders, E. & Owen, T. Science 198, 453–465 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Matsuda, J.-I., Lewis, R. S., Takahashi, H. & Anders, E. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 44, 1861–1874 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Mazor, E., Heymann, D. & Anders, E. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 34, 781–824 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Podosek, F. A., Honda, M. & Ozima, M. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 44, 1875–1884 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Wacker, J. F. & Anders, E. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 48, 2373–2380 (1984).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Ott, U., Begemann, F. Are all the ‘martian’ meteorites from Mars?. Nature 317, 509–512 (1985). https://doi.org/10.1038/317509a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/317509a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing