Abstract
Processing of existing gravity and aeromagnetic data with modern methods is providing new insights into crustal and mantle structures for large parts of the United States and Canada1–3. More than three-quarters of a million ground station readings of gravity are now available for this region. These data offer a wealth of information on crustal and mantle structures when reduced and displayed as Bouguer anomalies, where lateral variations are controlled by the size, shape and densities of underlying materials. We have used digital image processing techniques to generate Bouguer images that display more of the granularity inherent in the data as compared with existing contour maps. A dominant NW–SE linear trend of highs and lows can be seen extending from South Dakota, through Nebraska, and into Missouri (Fig. 2). The structural trend cuts across the major Precambrian boundary in Missouri, separating younger granites and rhyolites from older sheared granites and gneisses. This trend is probably related to features created during an early and perhaps initial episode of crustal assembly by collisional processes. The younger granitic materials are probably a thin cover over an older crust.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Arvidson, R. E., Guinness, E. A., Strebeck, J., Davies, G. & Schulz, K. EOS 18, 261–265 (1982).
Hildenbrand, T. G., Simpson, R. W., Godson, R. H. & Kane, M. F. U.S. geol. Surv., Geophys. Inves. Map GP-953-A (1982).
Zietz, I. U.S. geol. Surv., Geophys. Inves. Map GP-954-A (1982).
Eliason, E. & Soderblom, L. Proc. 8th Lunar planet. Sci. Conf. 1163–1170 (1977).
McCullogh, T. & Wasserburg, G. Science 200, 1003–1011 (1976).
Morey, C. & Sims, P. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 87, 141–152 (1976).
Gibb, R. A. & Thomas, M. D. Nature 262, 199–200 (1976).
Lewry, J. F. Nature 294, 69–72 (1981).
Sims, P. K., Card, K. D., Morey, G. B. & Peterman, Z. E. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 91, 690–698 (1980).
Warner, L. A. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 89, 161–171 (1978).
Green, J. C. Geol. Ass. Can. Spec. Pap. 16, 407–422 (1977).
Van Schmus, W. & Bickford, M. Precambrian Plate Tectonics (ed. Kroner, A.), 261–296 (Elsevier, 1981).
Guinness, E. A. et al. J. geophys. Res. 87, 8529–8545 (1982).
Guinness, E. A., Arvidson, R. E., Left, C., Edwards, M. & Bindschadler, D. Econ. Geol. 78, 654–663 (1983).
Eddy, M. S. thesis, Wash. Univ. (1984).
Burke, K. & Whiteman, A. J. in Implications of Continental Drift to the Earth Sciences (eds Tarling, D. H. & Runcorn, S. K.) 735–755 (Academic, 1973).
Dutch, S. I. Geology 11, 478–481 (1981).
Nelson, B. & DePaolo, D. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. 14, 575 (1982).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Arvidson, R., Bindschadler, D., Bowring, S. et al. Bouguer images of the North American craton and its structural evolution. Nature 311, 241–243 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/311241a0
Received:
Accepted:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/311241a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.