Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Bouguer images of the North American craton and its structural evolution

Abstract

Processing of existing gravity and aeromagnetic data with modern methods is providing new insights into crustal and mantle structures for large parts of the United States and Canada1–3. More than three-quarters of a million ground station readings of gravity are now available for this region. These data offer a wealth of information on crustal and mantle structures when reduced and displayed as Bouguer anomalies, where lateral variations are controlled by the size, shape and densities of underlying materials. We have used digital image processing techniques to generate Bouguer images that display more of the granularity inherent in the data as compared with existing contour maps. A dominant NW–SE linear trend of highs and lows can be seen extending from South Dakota, through Nebraska, and into Missouri (Fig. 2). The structural trend cuts across the major Precambrian boundary in Missouri, separating younger granites and rhyolites from older sheared granites and gneisses. This trend is probably related to features created during an early and perhaps initial episode of crustal assembly by collisional processes. The younger granitic materials are probably a thin cover over an older crust.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Arvidson, R. E., Guinness, E. A., Strebeck, J., Davies, G. & Schulz, K. EOS 18, 261–265 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hildenbrand, T. G., Simpson, R. W., Godson, R. H. & Kane, M. F. U.S. geol. Surv., Geophys. Inves. Map GP-953-A (1982).

  3. Zietz, I. U.S. geol. Surv., Geophys. Inves. Map GP-954-A (1982).

  4. Eliason, E. & Soderblom, L. Proc. 8th Lunar planet. Sci. Conf. 1163–1170 (1977).

  5. McCullogh, T. & Wasserburg, G. Science 200, 1003–1011 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Morey, C. & Sims, P. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 87, 141–152 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibb, R. A. & Thomas, M. D. Nature 262, 199–200 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lewry, J. F. Nature 294, 69–72 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Sims, P. K., Card, K. D., Morey, G. B. & Peterman, Z. E. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 91, 690–698 (1980).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Warner, L. A. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 89, 161–171 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Green, J. C. Geol. Ass. Can. Spec. Pap. 16, 407–422 (1977).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Van Schmus, W. & Bickford, M. Precambrian Plate Tectonics (ed. Kroner, A.), 261–296 (Elsevier, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Guinness, E. A. et al. J. geophys. Res. 87, 8529–8545 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Guinness, E. A., Arvidson, R. E., Left, C., Edwards, M. & Bindschadler, D. Econ. Geol. 78, 654–663 (1983).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Eddy, M. S. thesis, Wash. Univ. (1984).

  16. Burke, K. & Whiteman, A. J. in Implications of Continental Drift to the Earth Sciences (eds Tarling, D. H. & Runcorn, S. K.) 735–755 (Academic, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Dutch, S. I. Geology 11, 478–481 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Nelson, B. & DePaolo, D. Geol. Soc. Am. Abstr. 14, 575 (1982).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Arvidson, R., Bindschadler, D., Bowring, S. et al. Bouguer images of the North American craton and its structural evolution. Nature 311, 241–243 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/311241a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/311241a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing