Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A sampling artefact affecting the uranium content of deep-sea porewaters obtained from cores

Abstract

A wide range of uranium concentrations (1.3–65 µg l−1) have been reported in deep-sea porewaters extracted from cores1–5, values which contrast with the accepted constant figure of 3.3 ± 0.2 µg l−1 for the uranium content of open ocean seawater4,6–8. In seawater the constant level of uranium is believed to be due to the conservative behaviour of the anionic uranyl carbonate complex9,10. In a recent review Cochran11 concludes that porewater uranium contents higher than the seawater value are found in association with an anoxic condition in the sediments, while most oxic sediments have lower values in the range 2–2.5 µg l−1. This latter observation caused Cochran and Krishnaswami5 to suggest that uranium uptake by some sediment solid phase must occur and ought to be included in the oceanic uranium balance4,7. We present here detailed uranium porewater profiles for two contrasting eastern Atlantic sediments from an in situ porewater sampler and from squeezed corer sediment. These indicate that lower values in oxic sediments are almost certainly caused by a sampling artefact related to core decompression.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Baturin, G. N. & Kochenov, A. V. Geokhimiya 10, 1529–1536 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Boulad, A. P. & Michard, G. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 32, 77–83 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Somayajulu, B. L. K. & Church, T. M. J. geophys. Res. 78, 4529–4531 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Ku, T.-L., Knauss, K. G. & Mathieu, G. G. Deep-Sea Res. 24, 1005–1017 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Cochran, J. K. & Krishnaswami, S. Am. J. Sci. 280, 849–889 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wilson, J. D., Webster, R. K., Milner, G. W. C., Barnett, G. A. & Smales, A. A. Analyt. chim. Acta 23, 505–514 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Turekian, K. K. & Chan, L. H. in Activation Analysis in Geochemistry and Cosmochemistry (eds Bninfeld, A. O. & Steinnes, E.) 311–320 (Universitetsforlaget, Oslo, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Burton, J. D. in Chemical Oceanography Vol. 3, 2nd edn (eds Riley, J. P. & Skirrow, G.) 91–191 (Academic, London, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Starik, E. & Kolyadin, L. B. Geokhimiya 3, 204–213 (1957).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Langmuir, D. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 42, 547–569 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Cochran, J. K. in Uranium Series Disequilibrium: Applications to Environmental Problems (eds Ivanovich, M. & Harmon, R. S.) 384–430 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1982).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Sayles, F. L., Mangelsdorf, P. C., Wilson, T. R. S. & Hume, D. N. Deep-Sea Res. 23, 259–264 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Peters, R. D., Timmins, N. T., Calvert, S. E. & Morris, R. J. Inst. Oceanogr. Sci. Rep. 106 (1980).

  14. Crawford, R. W. & Baxter, M. S. Proc. IAEA Conf. Meth. Low-level Counting Spectrometry 263–276 (IAEA, Vienna, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Fleischer, R. L. & Delaney, A. C. Analyt. Chem. 48, 642–645 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Fleischer, R. L. & Lovett, D. B. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 32, 1126–1129 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Sørensen, J. & Wilson, T. R. S. Limnol. Oceanogr. (in the press).

  18. Emerson, S. et al. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 49, 57–80 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Sayles, F. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 45, 1061–1086 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Murray, J. W., Emerson, S. & Jahnke, R. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 44, 963–972 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Emerson, S., Grundmanis, V. & Graham, D. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 61, 220–232 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Jahnke, R., Heggie, D., Emerson, S. & Grundmanis, V. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 61, 233–256 (1982).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Giblin, A.M., Batts, B.D. & Swaine, D.J. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 45, 699–709 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Turner, D. R., Whitfield, M. & Dickson, A. G. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 45, 855–881 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Immel, R. & Osmond, J. K. Chem. Geol. 18, 263–272 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bernat, M., Bieri, R. H., Koide, M., Griffin, J. J. & Goldberg, E. D. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 34, 1053–1071 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Bernat, M. & Allegre, C. J. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 21, 310–314 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Weaver, P. P. E. & Kuijpers, A. Nature 306, 360–363 (1983).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  29. Crank, J. The Mathematics of Diffusion (Clarendon, Oxford, 1956).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  30. Li, Y.-H. & Gregory, S. Geochim. cosmochim. Acta 38, 703–714 (1978).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Toole, J., Thomson, J., Wilson, T. et al. A sampling artefact affecting the uranium content of deep-sea porewaters obtained from cores. Nature 308, 263–266 (1984). https://doi.org/10.1038/308263a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/308263a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing