Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A new limit on the nature of the galactic missing mass

Abstract

It has been widely accepted that large amounts of ‘missing’ mass must be present in spiral galaxies to explain both the small-scale and large-scale kinematic observations1. The small-scale data (velocity dispersions in the solar vicinity) refer to the volume within a few hundred parsecs of the Sun, and indicate that 25–50% of the gravitating mass has no detected luminous counterpart2–4. The large-scale data (velocity dispersions and rotation curves) show that this non-luminous component becomes increasingly important with increasing galactocentric distance, and is the dominant mass in the outer regions of galaxies, and in total. It is usually assumed that both the local and global missing mass are the same substance although no plausible candidate for this substance is known. The most widely assumed, and most conservative, candidate is a large population of very low-luminosity M dwarfs. These stars are attractive, both because they exist in large numbers, and because their mass (M) to light (L) ratios are similar to those needed to explain flat rotation curves (M/L 100–1,000). Finally, they are of very low intrinsic luminosity, and it is therefore observationally very difficult to determine their true space density from blue or visual surveys. We present here new observational results which show that low-luminosity M dwarfs are unlikely to provide the large-scale missing mass, and cannot provide the small-scale missing mass.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Faber, S. M. & Gallagher, J. S. A. Rev. Astr. Astrophys. 17, 135–187 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bahcall, J. N. Astrophys. J. (in the press).

  3. Hill, G., Hilditch, R. W. & Barnes, J. V. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 186, 813–829 (1979).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt, M. IAU Symp. No. 106 (in the press).

  5. Gilmore, G. & Reid, N. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 202, 1025–1047 (1983).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Reid, N. & Gilmore, G. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 201, 73–94 (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Reid, N. & Gilmore, G. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. (in the press).

  8. Gliese, W. & Jahreiss, H. Astr. Astrophys. Suppl. Ser. 38, 423–448 (1979).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Greenstein, J. L., Neugebauer, G. & Becklin, E. L. Astrophys. J. 161, 519–531 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reid, N. & Gilmore, G. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 196, 15P–18P (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Liebert, J. & Ferguson, D. H. Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc. 199, 29P–30P (1982).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gilmore, G., Hewett, P. A new limit on the nature of the galactic missing mass. Nature 306, 669–670 (1983). https://doi.org/10.1038/306669a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/306669a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing