Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Oocyte extracts reactivate developmentally inert Xenopus 5S genes in somatic nuclei

Abstract

In Xenopus and other amphibians, there are two major classes of 5S RNA gene1. One class, which codes for somatic-type 5S RNA, is expressed in both oocytes and somatic cells2; the other, which is 50 times more abundant3 and which codes for oocyte-type 5S RNA, is expressed in oocytes but not in somatic cells2,4. The developmentally inactivated oocyte-type genes are reactivated when erythrocyte nuclei are injected into most oocytes (activating oocytes)5. As the injected nuclei are induced to take on the natural activity of the host cell, the activation of oocyte-type 5S genes may represent a normal control mechanism. A special opportunity to investigate this mechanism is provided by the existence of certain individual animals whose oocytes consistently fail to activate 5S genes (non-activating oocytes). We have injected extracts of activating or non-activating oocytes, together with erythrocyte nuclei, into oocytes of each kind. We show here that the transcription of 5S genes is induced by extracts of activating oocytes (positive regulation) and is not inhibited by similar extracts of non-activating oocytes. The activating factor is sensitive to protease and heat treatment, suggesting that a protein is involved.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Brown, D. D. & Sugimoto, K. Cold Spring Harb. Symp. quant. Biol. 38, 501–505 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ford, P. J. & Southern, E. M. Nature new Biol. 241, 7–12 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Peterson, R. C., Doering, J. L. & Brown, D. D. Cell 20, 131–141 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wegnez, M., Monier, R. & Denis, H. FEBS Lett. 25, 13–20 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Korn, L. J. & Gurdon, J. B. Nature 289, 461–465 (1981).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Gurdon, J. B. J. Embryol. exp. Morph. 36, 523–540 (1976).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Engelke, D. R., Ng, S. Y., Shastry, B. & Roeder, R. G. Cell 19, 717–728 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Roeder, R. G. et al. ICN-UCLA Symp. 14, 521–540 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Thomas, N. & Maclean, N. J. Cell Sci. 19, 509–520 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Gurdon, J. B. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 58, 545–552 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Korn, L., Gurdon, J. & Price, J. Oocyte extracts reactivate developmentally inert Xenopus 5S genes in somatic nuclei. Nature 300, 354–355 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/300354a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/300354a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing