Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Pattern of opening rates along the axis of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge

Abstract

Vine and Wilson1, using the Vine and Matthews2 hypothesis, were the first to try to relate the magnetic pattern over the crests of the mid-ocean ridges to the known geomagnetic time scale to determine the spreading rate over the past few million years. Many determinations of spreading rate at the axis of the ridge during Plio-Pleistocene times have been published: Le Pichon3 and Morgan4, for example, used spreading rates computed for the axial magnetic pattern (10 Myr: anomaly 5 of Heirtzler et al.5 or for the past 5 Myr respectively) even when trying to assess the properties of instantaneous plate kinematics. Likewise in the systematic inversion of Minster et al.6 anomalies 3 and 5 were generally used thus averaging plate speeds over the past 5–10 Myr. Minster and Jordan7 sought to improve this and redetermined the spreading rates using magnetic anomalies 2 and 2′ yielding a mean averaging interval of <3 Myr. Here we examine plate behaviour over a shorter time scale in the reasonably well-surveyed axial region of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge south of the Azores. The average opening rates we obtained for this region for magnetic anomalies 1 (Brunhes), 2 and 2′ using two different geomagnetic time scales indicate that (1) there was a relative slowing down of the opening between anomalies 1 and 2 which may be of global significance; (2) the opening is compatible with a rigid plate model when it is averaged over 2.5 Myr although for shorter averaging times (1.8 and 0.7 Myr) there is some evidence of non-rigidity of the plates. Thus different segments of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge may display an independent behaviour and, with respect to relatively short time intervals, may show departures from characteristics typically associated with slow accretion.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vine, F. J. & Wilson, J. T. Science 150, 485–489 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Vine, F. J. & Matthews, D. H. Nature 199, 947–949 (1963).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Le Pichon, X. J. geophys. Res. 73, 3661–3697 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Morgan, W. J. J. geophys. Res. 73, 1959–1982 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Heirtzler, J. R., Dickson, G. O., Pitman, W. C. III, Herron, E. & Le Pichon, X. J. geophys. Res. 73, 2119–2136 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Minster, J. B., Jordan, T. H., Molnar, P. & Haines, E. Geophys. J. R. astr. Soc. 36, 541–576 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Minster, J. B. & Jordan, T. H. J. geophys. Res. 83, 5331–5354 (1978).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Glenn, M. F. Int. Hydrog. Rev. 67, 35–39 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Renard, V. & Allenou, J. P. Int. Hydrog. Rev. 56, 35–67 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Anderson, R. N., McKenzie, D. P. & Sclater, J. G. Earth. planet. Sci. Lett. 18, 391–407 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Le Douaran, S. & Francheteau, J. Earth. planet. Sci. Lett. 54, 29–47 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Talwani, M., Windisch, C. C. & Langseth, M. G. J. geophys. Res. 76, 473–517 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Bernard, P., Cuer, M., Bayer, R. & Francheteau, J. (in preparation).

  14. Greenewalt, D. & Taylor, P. T. J. geophys. Res. 79, 4401–4405 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Needham, H. D. & Francheteau, J. Earth. planet. Sci. Lett. 22, 29–43 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Renard, V. Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr. 18, 801–805 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. MacDonald, K. C. Bull. geol. Soc. Am. 88, 541–555 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mankinen, E. A. & Dalrymple, G. B. J. geophys. Res. 84, 615–626 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rea, D. K. & Scheidegger, K. F. J. Volcan. geotherm. Res. 5, 135–148 (1979).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Arcyana Science 190, 108–116 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Ballard, R. D. et al. Science 190, 103–107 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Ballard, R. D., Francheteau, J., Juteau, T., Rangin, C. & Normark, W. Earth. planet. Sci. Lett. 55, 1–10 (1981).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  23. Storzer, D. & Selo, M. Bull. Soc. Geol. Fr. 18, 807–810 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Selo, M. & Storzer, D. C. r. hébd Seanc. Acad. Sci., Paris D289, 1125–1127 (1979).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. MacDonald, K. C., Becker, K., Spiess, F. N. & Ballard, R. D. Earth planet. Sci. Lett. 48, 1–7 (1980).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  26. Iaga Division 1 Study Group J. geophys. Res. 81, 5163–5164 (1976).

  27. Bird, P. & Phillips, J. D. J. geophys. Res. 80, 4021–4027 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Douaran, S., Needham, H. & Francheteau, J. Pattern of opening rates along the axis of the Mid-Atlantic Ridge. Nature 300, 254–257 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/300254a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/300254a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing