Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Mechanisms of interpolation in human spatial vision

Abstract

Recently, interest has revived in the classical problems of vernier and stereoscopic acuity. The precision with which observers can align two bars in a vernier task is as high as 2 sec arc, which is much finer than the grain of the retinal receptor mosaic, where the cones are separated by 20–30 sec arc even at their most densely packed. Thus, it seems that the visual system may be able to interpolate between the discrete samples provided by the retinal mosaic; recently, several possible mechanisms have been proposed1,2. Mathematically there is no mystery about interpolation. The optical system of the eye acts as a low-pass filter removing all frequencies above 60 cycles deg−1, so it follows from the sampling theorem that the retinal image can be fully represented by sampling at a frequency of 120 cycles deg−1, which is approximately that of the receptor mosaic. In principle, therefore, discrete sampling by the retinal mosaic does not remove information from the image. Indeed, the low-pass filtering action of the eye implies that acuity would not be lost, even if the signal itself were divided into discrete samples, before observation. We report here that human observers can locate the spatial position of a periodic visual pattern with a precision as high as 5–10 sec arc, even though the pattern is coarsely sampled at an interval over 10 times that amount. This suggests that the human visual system can construct a surprisingly accurate representation of a pattern from discrete samples, despite the samples being sufficiently widely spaced to be visually resolved.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ditchburn, R. W. Eye Movements and Visual Perception (Clarendon, Oxford, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Barlow, H. B. Nature 279, 189–191 (1979).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Nyman, G. & Laurinen, P. Nature 297, 324–325 (1982).

    Article  CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Watt, R. J. & Andrews, D. P. Curr. Psychol. Rev. 1, 205–214 (1981).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Wilson, H. R. & Bergen, J. R. Vision Res. 19, 19–32 (1979).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Marr, D. & Hildreth, E. Proc. R. Soc. B207, 187–217 (1980).

    CAS  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Morgan, M., Watt, R. Mechanisms of interpolation in human spatial vision. Nature 299, 553–555 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/299553a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/299553a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing