Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Hyperacuity and amblyopia

Abstract

The most frequent cause of visual loss in childhood is functional amblyopia, an abnormality of visual acuity usually associated with either anisometropia (unequal refractive errors) or strabismus (turned eye) during early development. The usual clinical investigation of the visual acuity of amblyopes involves discrimination of the high contrast letters of a Snellen chart; however, there are other aspects of acuity, for example, grating acuity (the high spatial frequency limit of vision) and Vernier acuity (the smallest perceptible misalignment). Because of the extreme precision of Vernier acuity compared with either grating or Snellen acuity, it is considered to be a form of hyperacuity which requires very precise positional information. In an effort to understand the nature of the neural abnormalities which cause the reduced acuity of amblyopes, we have measured here the Vernier acuity of amblyopic observers using an extended Vernier grating stimulus, and compared these results with their Snellen acuity and grating acuity. The results showed that different acuity losses are associated with anisometropic versus strabismic amblyopia. When scaled with respect to their grating acuity, anisometropic amblyopes, like normals, showed hyperacuity, even at high spatial frequencies, while strabismic amblyopes showed severe losses in Vernier acuity. Snellen letter acuity showed a similar deficit relative to grating acuity in strabismic but not in anisometropic amblyopes. Contrary to some previous theories which have considered that all forms of amblyopia share a comon neural basis, these results strongly support the view1,2 that different neural losses are associated with amblyopias of different aetiologies.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hess, R. & Bradley, A. Nature 287, 463–464 (1980).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hess, R., Campbell, F. & Zimmern, R. Vision Res. 20, 295–306 (1980).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Dorfman, D. & Alf, A. J. math. Psychol. 6, 487–496 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Davidson, D. & Eskridge, B. Am. J. Optom. Physiol. Optics 54, 756–766 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Berkeley, M. & Sprague, J. in Frontiers in Visual Science (eds Cool, S. & Smith, E.) 220–239 (Springer, New York, 1978).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Flom, M., Weymouth, F. & Kahneman, D. J. opt. Soc. Am. 53, 1026–1032 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Pugh, M. Br. J. Ophthal. 42, 449–460 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hess, R., Campbell, F. & Greenhalgh, T. Pflügers Arch. ges. Physiol. 377, 201–207 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bedell, H. & Flom, M. Invest. Ophthal. vis. Sci. 20, 263–268 (1981).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Levi, D., Klein, S. Hyperacuity and amblyopia. Nature 298, 268–270 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/298268a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/298268a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing