Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A model of the nerve impulse using two first-order differential equations

Abstract

The Hodgkin–Huxley model1 of the nerve impulse consists of four coupled nonlinear differential equations, six functions and seven constants. Because of the complexity of these equations and the necessity for numerical solution, it is difficult to use them in simulations of interactions in small neural networks. Thus, it would be useful to have a second-order differential equation which predicted correctly properties such as the frequency–current relationship. Fitzhugh2 introduced a second-order model of the nerve impulse, but his equations predict an action potential duration which is similar to the inter-spike interval3 and they do not give a reasonable frequency–current relationship. To develop a second-order model having few parameters but which does not have these disadvantages, we have generalized the second-order Fitzhugh equations2, and based the form of the functions in the new equations on voltage-clamp data obtained from a snail neurone. We report here an unexpected property of the resulting equations—the x and y null clines in the phase plane lie close together when the phase point is on the recovery side of the phase plane. The resulting slow movement along the phase path gives a long inter-spike interval, a property not shown clearly by previous models2,4. The model also predicts the linearity of the frequency–current relationship, and may be useful for studying detailed interactions in networks containing small numbers of neurones.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hodgkin, A. L. & Huxley, A. F. J. Physiol., Lond. 117, 500–554 (1952).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fitzhugh, R. Biophys. J. 1, 445–466 (1961).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Jack, J. J. B., Noble, D. & Tsien, R. W. (eds) Electric Current Flow in Excitable Cells, 330 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1975).

  4. Kokoz, Yu M. & Krinskii, V. J. Biofizika 18, 878–885 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Frank, K. & Tauc, L. in Cellular Function of Membrane Transport (ed. Hoffman, J.) 113–134 (Prentice-Hall, New Jersey, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Connor, J. A. & Stevens, C. F. J. Physiol., Lond. 213, 31–53 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Wilson, W. A. & Goldner, M. M. J. Neurobiol. 6, 411–422 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Merson, R. H. in Proc. of Symp. on Data Processing (Weapons Research Establishment, South Australia, 1957).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hindmarsh, J., Rose, R. A model of the nerve impulse using two first-order differential equations. Nature 296, 162–164 (1982). https://doi.org/10.1038/296162a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/296162a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing