Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Is the similarity of monozygotic twins due to genetic factors alone?

Abstract

It is generally assumed that the identity of the genotype explains why there is less difference between monozygotic than between dizygotic twins. But monozygotic twins are also exposed to identical non-genetic influences, which act on the common zygote until the time of separation into the two twin partners. We have studied such influences by comparing genetically identical monozygotic and dizygotic mouse twins transplanted into foster mothers at the 8-cell stage. We show that monozygotic twins have a greater degree of similarity than genetically identical dizygotic twins. This suggests that the differences between dizygotic twins may be due in part to non-genetic influences on the zygote as far as the third cleavage stage.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Deol, M. S. & Grüneberg, H. Genet. Res. 1, 50–88 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hedrich, H. J., Rapp, K., Zschege, C. Z. Versuchstierk. 17, 263–274 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Festing, M. Inbred Strains in Biomedical Research (Macmillan, London, 1979).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  4. Hedrich, H. J. in The Mouse in Biomedical Research Vol. 1. (eds Foster, H. L., Small, J. D. & Fox, J. G.) 159–176 (Academic, New York, 1981).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Nimierko, A. & Opas, J. Methods in Mammalian Reproduction (Academic, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  6. McLaren, A. J. Reprod. Fert. 19, 341–346 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Whitten, W. K. Adv. Biosci. 6, 129–141 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hogan, B. & Tilly, R. Nature 265, 626–629 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. McLaren, A. J. exp. Biol. 33, 394–416 (1956).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Weber, E. Grundriβ der Biologischen Statistik 7th edn, Ch. 37, 268–270 (VEB Gustav Fischer, Jena, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Falconer, D. S. Introduction to quantitative genetics (Oliver & Boyd, Edinburgh and London, 1960).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Grüneberg, H. The Pathology of Development (Blackwell, Oxford, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Gärtner, K., Baunack, E. Is the similarity of monozygotic twins due to genetic factors alone?. Nature 292, 646–647 (1981). https://doi.org/10.1038/292646a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/292646a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing