Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Does the variability of the cell cycle result from one or many chance events?

Abstract

Smith and Martin1,2 proposed the transition probability (TP) model to explain the significance of the variability of the cell cycle length of individual cells within a clone or culture. This postulates that the cell cycle length consists of a fixed period of time, which is the same for all members of the population, plus a variable period which is distributed according to a negative exponential function among the individual cell cycles. This variable part is contained entirely within G1, may be controlled hormonally by the organism, and is assumed to result from a single first order random process that terminates the variable part of the cell cycle with constant probability. As originally proposed, the model failed to account for timing of the fastest third of the population3. Minor and Smith4 assumed that there is biological variability in the previously presumed constant part of the cycle and that this variability accounts for the failure to see an abrupt discontinuity. They proposed that most of this kind of variation can be cancelled out by comparing sister cells. Thus, they proposed a second plot to test their model, the β-plot. This is a two-cycle semi-logarithmic plot of the percentage of sister-sister cells having a smaller difference in age at division than the time value corresponding to the abscissa of the graph. Their model predicts a straight line starting at 100% at time zero. Any model would require this value at time zero, but theirs requires that the plot be straight and parallel to the terminal slope of the α-plot. Shields and Smith5 and Shields6 have convincingly shown that for tissue culture cells of both mouse cell lines and Staphylococcus albus, the β-plots are linear for 97–98% of the cell populations and parallel to the α-plots. This has been taken as strong support for the TP model. Recently, in developing computer simulation of a growth controlled (GC) model7, I found that certain properties, such as the linearity of β-plots, are very sensitive to the presence of subpopulations of cells with longer doubling times. My major purpose here is to point out three statistical aspects of the cell cycle that are strongly influenced by growth rate heterogeneity for any model of the cell cycle.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Smith, J. A. & Martin, L. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 1263–1267 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Smith, J. A. & Martin, L. in Cell Cycle Controls (eds Padilla, G. M., Cameron, I. L. & Zimmerman, A.) 43–60 (Academic, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Pardee, A. B., Shilo, B.-Z. & Koch, A. L. Cold Spring Harb. Conf. Cell Proliferation 6, 373–392 (1979).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Minor, P. S. & Smith, J. A. Nature 248, 241–243 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Shields, R. & Smith, J. A. J. cell Physiol. 91, 345–356 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Shields, R. Nature 273, 755–758 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Koch, A. L. & Schaechter, M. J. gen. Microbiol. 29, 435–454 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Powell, E. O. J. gen. Microbiol. 18, 382–417 (1958).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Woldringh, C. L. J. Bact. 125, 248–257 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Woldringh, C. L., De Jong, M. A., Van en Berg, W. & Koppes, L. J. Bact. 131, 270–299 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Koch, A. L. J. gen. Microbiol. 43, 1–5 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Schaechter, M., Williamson, J. P., Hood, J. R. Jr & Koch, A. L. J. gen. Microbiol. 29, 421–434 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Koch, A. L. Adv. microbial Physiol. 16, 49–98 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ecker, R. E. & Kokaisl, G. J. Bact. 98, 1219–1226 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Newman, C. & Kubitschek, H. E. J. mollec. Biol. 121, 461–471 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Koch, A. Does the variability of the cell cycle result from one or many chance events?. Nature 286, 80–82 (1980). https://doi.org/10.1038/286080a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/286080a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing