Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Bryozoan overgrowth interactions—the interdependence of competition for space and food

Abstract

Space has been demonstrated repeatedly to be a limiting resource to sessile suspension-feeding invertebrates1–7,15, whereas the question of whether food resources are ever limiting has long been a controversial topic8,9. On the basis of previous research and in the virtual absence of any mechanistic understanding, it is commonly assumed that interactions can be interpreted as competition for spatial resources alone. This assumption is clearly unacceptable. Whereas a mobile organism might feed in one location rich in prey, spawn in another safe from predators of its young, and hide in yet another inaccessible to its own predator, a sessile organism cannot separate, spatially or temporally, its demands for food to eat and space on which to live. For the sessile organism, access to food implies access to space and vice versa. Consequently, the empirical observation of competition for space does not justify the assumption that competition for food is unimportant. I report here that competition for food among suspension feeders can occur and may, in fact, provide a mechanism by which sessile organisms compete for space.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Buss, L. W. & Jackson, J. B. C. Am. Nat. 113, 223–234 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Connell, J. H. Ecology 42, 710–723 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dayton, P. K. Ecol. Monogr. 41, 351–389 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Knight-Jones, E. W. & Moyse, J. Symp. Soc. exp. Biol. 15, 72–95 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Lang, J. C. Bull. mar. Sci. 23, 260–279 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Paine, R. Y. Oecolog. 15, 93–120 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Stebbing, A. R. D. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 53, 247–261 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Levinton, J. Am. Nat. 106, 472–486 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pütter, A. F. Z. allg. Physiol. 16, 65–114 (1914).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Jackson, J. B. C. Am. Nat. 111, 743–767 (1977); in Biology and Systematics of Colonial Organisms (eds Larwood, G. & Rosen, B.) 499–555 (Academic, London, 1979).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ryland, J. S. Bryozoans (Hutchinson University Library, London, 1970).

  12. Silén, L. in Biology of Bryozoa (eds Woollacott, R. M. & Zimmer, R. L.) 184–232 (Academic, New York, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Bryan, P. G. Micronesica 9, 237–242 (1973).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Buss, L. W. in Aspects of Sponge Biology (eds Harrison, F. W. & Cowden, R. R.) 315–328 (Academic, New York, 1976).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  15. Jackson, J. B. C. & Buss, L. W. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 72, 5160–5163 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Chiba, Y. & Kàto, M. Sci. Rep. Tôhoko Univ. 32, 201–206 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Connell, J. H. Ecology 42, 710–723 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lang, J. C. Bull. mar. Sci. 23, 260–279 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  19. Stebbing, A. R. D. J. mar. biol. Ass. U.K. 53, 247–261 (1973).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Miller, R. S. Adv. Ecol. Res. 4, 1–74 (1967).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Reidl, R. & Forstner, H. Sarsia 34, 163–188 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Winston, J. E. in Biology of Bryozoa (eds Woollacott, R. M. & Zimmer, R. L.) 233–271 (Academic, New York, 1977); Bull. mar. Sci. 28, 1–31 (1977).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  23. Bishop, J. W. & Barr, L. M. in Animal Colonies (eds Boardman, R. S., Cheetam, A. H. & Oliver, W.A.) 433–438 (Dowden, Hutchinson & Ross, Pennsylvania, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  24. Crisp, D. J. Nature 178, 1076 (1956).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Buss, L. Bryozoan overgrowth interactions—the interdependence of competition for space and food. Nature 281, 475–477 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/281475a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/281475a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing