Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Dual origin of recent Dutch elm disease outbreaks in Europe

Abstract

Dutch elm disease was first recorded in 1918 in Western Europe and quickly spread to the US. The origin of the causal fungus, Ceratocystis ulmi, is unknown. A serious new epidemic began in the UK around 1970 and led to the discovery that there were two strains of the fungus: a highly pathogenic ‘aggressive strain’ responsible for the epidemic and thought to have been imported from North America1,2, and a less pathogenic ‘non-aggressive strain’ believed to be endemic to the UK and adjacent parts of Europe since the 1920s (refs 1, 2). Recent disease outbreaks associated with the appearance of the aggressive strain in Holland3 (1972), France4,5 and Germany6,7 (1973) were assumed to be secondary foci of the UK epidemic. A similar outbreak in Italy7 (1973), however, seemed to be of longer standing (L. Mittemberger and O. Rackham, personal communications) and this, together with the discovery of the aggressive strain in Iran in 1975 (ref. 8), suggested that there was more than one source of the aggressive strain. I show here that there are two distinct races of the aggressive strain and that they have probably entered Europe independently.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gibbs, J. N. & Brasier, C. M. Nature 241, 381–383 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Brasier, C. M. & Gibbs, J. N. Nature 242, 607–609 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Gremmen, J., Heybroek, H. H. & de Kam, M. Ned. BoschbTijdschr. 48, 137–143 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Pinon, J. La Recherche 4, 700–701 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pinon, J. Phytoma 5–8 (1978).

  6. Maschning, E. Allg. Forstz 29, 306–308 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Brasier, C. M. & Gibbs, J. N. in Proc. 1973 IUFRO Conference on Dutch elm disease, Minneapolis 53–66 (USDA Forest Service, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Brasier, C. M. & Afsharpour, F. Eur. J. For. Path. 9, 113–122 (1979).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Brasier, C. M. Trans Br. mycol. Soc. 68, 45–52 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Brasier, C. M. & Gibbs, J. N. Nature 257, 128–131 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Walsh, P. F. & Mangan, A. J. Dep. Agric. Repub. Ire. 74, 40–43 (1977).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Brasier, C. M. & Gibbs, J. N. Ann. appl. Biol. 80, 231–235 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Brasier, C. Dual origin of recent Dutch elm disease outbreaks in Europe. Nature 281, 78–80 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/281078a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/281078a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing