Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

A chiasma–hormonal hypothesis relating Down's syndrome and maternal age

Abstract

THE incidence of the human congenital abnormality known as Down's syndrome (or mongolism) has been observed to increase with maternal age1. The trend of sharply increased incidence beyond the age of 30 has been well documented2, and various hypotheses have been formulated to explain it. These include cumulative ovum or uterine dysfunction (radiation3, chemicals4, disease5), acute effects of radiation and chemicals, hormonal effects6, the ‘production line’ hypothesis7,8 and changes in sexual behaviour9. We describe here our hypothesis that there is an interaction between the hormonally governed rate of meiosis and the timing of chiasma terminalisation. We propose that changing hormone levels during the menstrual cycle not only trigger resumption of meiosis in the ovum10, but also control the rate of meiosis through the availability of a limiting substance11. As hormone levels and the length of the cycle change with advancing age of the mother, meiosis slows down, and chiasma frequencies decline7,12. Meiotic chromosome bivalents are held together by their chiasmata against strong mutual repulsion during late dictyotene and diakinesis13, making smaller bivalents with fewer chiasmata, such as 21, the most vulnerable to premature separation during terminalisation14,15; premature separation can lead to trisomy 21, by far the most frequent cytological manifestation of Down's syndrome16.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Shuttleworth, G. E. Mentally-Deficient Children: Their Treatment and Training (Lewis, London, 1895).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hook, E. B. & Porter, I. H. (eds) in Population Cytogenetics: Studies in Humans, 353–365 (Academic, New York, 1977).

  3. Siglar, A. T., Cohen, B. H., Lilienfeld, A. M., Westlake, J. E. & Hetznecker, W. H. J. Pediat. 70, 608–611 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Fialkow, P. J., Marin, G. M. & Sprague, C. A. Am. J. hum. Genet. 25, 317–322 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Nichols, W. N. Lancet 1, 1059 (1970).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Penrose, L. S. & Smith, G. F. Down's Anomaly (Little and Brown, Boston, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Henderson, S. A. & Edwards, R. G. Nature 218, 22 (1968).

    ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Henderson, S. A. & Edwards, R. G. in Reproduction and Aging (eds Balazs, A., Nelson-Rees, W. A. & Watiaux, J. M.) 168–181 (M. S. S. Information Corp., New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  9. German, J. Am. Scient. 58, 182–201 (1970).

    ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Ahren, K., Hamberger, L., Herlitz, H., Hillensjo, T., Nilsson, L., Rosberg, S. & Selstam, G. in Biological and Clinical Aspects of Reproduction (eds Ebling, F. J. G. & Henderson, I. W.) 398–437 (Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Baulieu, E. E., Godeau, F., Schorderet, M. & Schorderet-Slatkine, S. Nature 275, 493–498 (1978).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Luthardt, F. W., Palmer, C. & Yu, P. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 12, 68–79 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Darlington, C. D. J. Genet. 21, 207–286 (1929).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Slizyniski, B. Genet. Res. 1, 477–486 (1960).

    Google Scholar 

  15. Yuncken, C. Cytogenetics 7, 234–238 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Donnell, G. N., Alfi, O. S., Rublee, J. C. & Koch, R. Down's Syndrome (Mongolism): Research, Prevention and Management (eds Koch, R. & Cruz, F. F.) 16–31 (Brunner/Mazel, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Midgely, A., Zeleznik, A., Rajaniemi, H., Richards, J. & Reichert, L. Gonadotropin and Gonadal Function (ed. Moudgal, N) 416–427 (Academic, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  18. McNatty, K. & Sawers, R. S. J. Endocr. 66, 391–400 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Channing, C. P. & Tsafriri, A. Prog. Endocr. Metab. 26, 413–468 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Sherman, B. M. & Korenman, S. G. J. clin. Invest. 55, 699–706 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Netter, A. in Aging and Estrogen (eds vanKeep, P. A. & Lauritzen, C.) 143–151 (Karger, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Rasmussen, H. & Goodman, D. B. P. Physiol. Rev. 57, 421–509 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Yussman, M., Taymor, M., Migata, J. & Pheteplace, C. Fert. Steril. 21, 119–125 (1970).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Franchimont, P., Legros, J. J., Demoulin, A. & Bourguignon, J. P. Biological and Clinical Aspects of Reproduction (eds Ebling, F. J. G. & Henderson, I. W.) 257–269 (Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  25. Kennedy, J. F. in Oogenesis (eds Biggers, J. D. & Schuetz, A. W.) 439–457 (Univ. Park Press, Baltimore, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  26. Lilienfeld, A. M. & Benesch, C. H. Epidemiology of Mongolism (Johns Hopkins Press, Baltimore, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  27. Croxatto, H. B. et al. in Biological and Clinical Aspects of Reproduction (eds. Ebling, F.J. G. & Henderson, W.) 282–284 (Excerpta Medica, Amsterdam, 1976).

    Google Scholar 

  28. Yussman, M. A. & Taymor, M. L. J. clin. Endocr. 30, 396–399 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Carr, D. H. Perspectives in Cytogenetics: the Next Decade (eds. Wright, S. W., Crandall, B.F. & Boyer, L.) 75–78 (Thomas, Springfield, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  30. Daniel, J. C. & Cowman, M. L. Fert. Steril. 17, 804–814 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  31. Fugo, N. W. & Butcher, R. L. Fert. Steril. 17, 894–914 (1966).

    Google Scholar 

  32. Magenis, R. E., Overton, K. M., Chamberlin, J., Brady, T. & Lovrien, E. Hum. Genet. 37, 7–16 (1977).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Oster, J. Mongolism (Danish Scientific Press, Copenhagen, 1953).

    Google Scholar 

  34. Carter, C. O., Evans, D. A. & Stewart, A. M. 1961. Lancet 2, 1042 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  35. Collmann, R. D. & Stoller, A. J. ment. Defic. Res. 13, 13–19 (1969).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Halevi, H. S. Br. J. prev. soc. Med. 21, 66–77 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  37. Lindsjo, A. Acta paediat. scand. 63, 571–576 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Mikkelsen, M., Fischer, G., Stene, J., Stene, E. & Petersen, E. Ann. hum. Genet. 40, 177–182 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Lowry, R. B., Jones, J. C., Renwick, D. H. G. & Trimble, B. K. Teratology 14, 29–34 (1976).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Avers, C. J. Basic Cell Biology. (Van Nostrand, New York, 1978).

    Google Scholar 

  41. Hook, E. B. & Chambers, G. M. Birth Defects: Orig. Art. Ser. 13, 123–141 (1977).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  42. Hook, E. B. & Lindsjo, A. Am. J. Hum. Genet. 30, 19–27 (1978).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CROWLEY, P., GULATI, D., HAYDEN, T. et al. A chiasma–hormonal hypothesis relating Down's syndrome and maternal age. Nature 280, 417–419 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/280417a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/280417a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing