Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Meiotic crossing over exchange in the female mouse visualised by BUdR substitution

Abstract

ALTHOUGH chiasmata have long been thought to be sites of crossing over exchange between chromosomes during meiosis, in keeping with the partial chiasmatype hypothesis1,2, there has been no convincing visual evidence of this despite many attempts (summarised in refs 3–6). Taylor7 confirmed by autoradiography that meiotic crossing over occurs by exchange involving breakage and reunion of chromatids. However, because of the poor resolution of autoradiography, requiring study of meiotic chromosomes after 1st metaphase, and because of interference by sister chromatid exchanges, a one-to-one correspondence between chiasmata and exchanges of labelled chromatid segments could not be established8,9. The difficulty was alleviated by correlating chiasmata and exchanges with temperature variation10, or by selecting a species with localised chiasmata and thus with predictable points of exchange11. 5-Bromodeoxyuridine (BUdR) substitution with differential labelling and consequent differential staining of mitotic chromosomes12–15 offer the potential for studying chromosomes at 1st meiotic metaphase, giving an unequivocal picture and separating sister chromatid exchanges from chiasma exchange points between homologues. Tease16 has reported success with male grasshopper meiotic chromosomes, but an attempt with the male mouse showed only sister chromatid exchanges in the sex chromosomes, and the autosomal bivalents at 1st meiotic metaphase were not differentially stained17. In the male Armenian hamster the sex chromosomes showed differential staining and an apparent exchange of segments but again the autosomes were not critically differentially stained18. This may be partly due to the make-up of the male meiotic chromosomes. We have overcome these problems by using an in vitro/in vivo technique19 which enables us to expose the differentiating germ cells of embryonic ovaries to BUdR in vitro and to collect and display the chromosomes20 of the mature oocytes some time after transplantation into young spayed adults. We report our results here.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Janssens, F. A. Cellule 25, 387–411 (1909).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Janssens, F. A. Cellule 34, 133–359 (1924).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Brown, S. W. & Zohary, D. Genetics 40, 850–873 (1955).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Whitehouse, H. L. K. in Towards an Understanding of the Mechanism of Heredity, 3rd edn, 89–136, 341–342 (Edward Arnold, London, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  5. White, M. J. D. Animal Cytology and Evolution, 3rd edn, 159–188 (Cambridge University Press, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Catcheside, D. G. in The Genetics of Recombination, 90–91 (Edward Arnold, London, 1977).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Taylor, J. H. J. Cell Biol. 25, 57–67 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Moens, P. B. Chromosoma 19, 277–285 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Craig-Cameron, T. & Jones, G. H. Heredity 25, 223–232 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Peacock, W. J. Genetics 65, 593–617 (1970).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  11. Jones, G. H. Chromosoma 34, 367–382 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Latt, S. A. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 70, 3395–3399 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Allen, J. W. & Latt, S. A. Nature 260, 449–451 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Bloom, S. E. & Hsu, T. C. Chromosoma 51, 261–267 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Vogel, W. & Bauknecht, T. Nature 260, 448–449 (1976).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Tease, C. Nature 272, 823–824 (1978).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Allen, J. W. & Latt, S. A. Chromosoma 58, 325–340 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Allen, J. W., Shuler, C. F. & Latt, S. A. Somatic Cell Genet. 4, 393–405 (1978).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Rumery, R. E. & Blandau, R. J. J. Morph. 149, 421–436 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Polani, P. E. & Jagiello, G. M. Cytogenet. Cell Genet. 16, 505–529 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Manguoushi, M. J. Anat. 118, 601–610 (1974).

    Google Scholar 

  22. Polani, P. E. Conference on Trisomy 21 (Down Syndrome), Boston (NIH, Bethesda, in the press).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

POLANI, P., CROLLA, J., SELLER, M. et al. Meiotic crossing over exchange in the female mouse visualised by BUdR substitution. Nature 278, 348–349 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/278348a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/278348a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing