Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Transducer noise in a photoreceptor

Abstract

IN our attempts to unravel the workings of visual systems, we seek neural responses and interactions which can account for visual behaviour. A popular measure of visual performance is the threshold intensity at which a stimulus is detected with a given probability. To account for these detection tasks, one must not only measure neural signals at threshold1,2, but also find the limiting sources of variance (that is, the noise) both within3 and outside4,5 the nervous system6. The manner in which the random nature of photon absorptions can limit the performance of visual systems is well understood4,5,7,8. When bleaching effects are negligible, photon absorptions follow the Poisson distribution. Consequently photon counts derived from the same mean signal have a variance equal to their mean. These fluctuations in counts are an inherent property of photon signals and are referred to as photon shot noise. Processes within the visual system generate intrinsic noise7, but to assess its effect on thresholds one must first account for photon shot noise. This is generally difficult because photon catch cannot be measured directly, and must be estimated from optical parameters which are subject to significant error7. We have estimated the levels of photon shot noise and intrinsic transducer noise9 in locust photoreceptors at low light intensities. We have chosen to search for sources of intrinsic noise in the visual system of the locust because it has recently been shown that, at low intensities, each effective photon produces a single, large quantum bump10 (Fig. 1). Thus, we measure precisely the number of photons contributing to photoreceptor signals and derive, from the total response variance, that additional variance due to intrinsic noise. We report here that the transducer noise mimics the properties of photon shot noise, is of similar magnitude, and, in most conditions, must have an equally significant role in determining thresholds.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scholes, J. & Reichardt, W. Kybernetik 6, 74–80 (1969).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Fain, G. L., Granda, A. M. & Maxwell, J. H. Nature 265, 181–183 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Johnson, K. O., Darian-Smith, I. & LaMotte, C. J. Neurophysiol. 36, 347–370 (1973).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Rose, A. Vision, Human and Electronic (Plenum, New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Barlow, H. B. in Photophysiology, Vol. 2 (ed. Giese, A. C.) 163–202 (Academic, New York, 1964).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Lillywhite, P. G. & Laughlin, S. B. Proc. Aust. physiol. pharmac. Soc. 9, 49P (1978).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barlow, H. B. in Photoreception in Vertebrates (eds Barlow, H. B. & Fatt, P.)(Academic, New York, in the press).

  8. Reichardt, W. in The Neurosciences: Second Study Programme (ed. Schmitt, F. O.) 494–511 (Rockefeller Univ., New York, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Laughlin, S. B. J. comp. Physiol. 111, 221–247 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Lillywhite, P. G. J. comp. Physiol. 122, 189–200 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lillywhite, P. G. J. comp. Physiol. 125, 13–27 (1978).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirschfeld, K. in The Functional Organisation of the Compound Eye (ed. Bernhard, C. G.) 297–307 (Pergamon, Oxford, 1966).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Ashmore, J. F. & Falk, G. Nature 270, 69–71 (1977).

    Article  ADS  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lamb, T. D. & Simon, E. J. J. Physiol., Lond. 263, 257–286 (1976).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Katz, B. & Miledi, R. J. Physiol., Lond. 224, 665–699 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Lipetz, L. E. in Handbook of Sensory Physiology, Vol. 1 (ed. Loewenstein, W. R.) 191–225 (Springer, Berlin, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  17. Laughlin, S. B. in The Compound Eye and Vision of Insects (ed. Horridge, G. A.) 341–358 (Clarendon, Oxford, 1974)

    Google Scholar 

  18. Snyder, A. W., Stavenga, D. G. & Laughlin, S. B. J. comp. Physiol. 116, 183–207 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Van Meeteren, A. Vision Res. 18, 257–267 (1978).

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LILLYWHITE, P., LAUGHLIN, S. Transducer noise in a photoreceptor. Nature 277, 569–572 (1979). https://doi.org/10.1038/277569a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/277569a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing