Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Simulated sunflecks have large, rapid effects on plant stem extension

Abstract

CONTINUOUS simulated shade light quantity1 and shade light quality2 both modulate plant stem extension. However, in nature, shade light is not static, but is invariably, periodically interrupted by sunlight, in a manner primarily dependent on vegetation density and canopy structure3–5. The significance of ‘sunflecks’ to growth and development of shaded vegetation remains almost unknown. Certainly in etiolated tissue, abnormal changes of light quality have been found to mediate very rapid changes of hypocotylar extension rate6, and in green tissue of deeply shaded plants the maintenance of photosynthesis above the compensation point may be highly dependent on light from sunflecks5. Furthermore, after very long treatment periods, developmental changes have been observed in response to short term light/dark alternations7. We report here that very brief changes of the light environment, simulating sun-flecks, can elicit rapid, marked, changes in extension rate in mature green plants.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Grime, J. P. & Jeffrey, D. W. J. Ecol. 53, 621–642 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Morgan, D. C. & Smith, H. Nature 262, 210–212 (1976).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Norman, J. M. & Tanner, C. B. Agron. J. 61, 847–849 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Woods, D. B. & Turner, N. C. New Phytol. 70, 77–84 (1971).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Kriedemann, P. E., Törökfalvy, E. & Smart, R. E. Photosynthetica 7, 18–27 (1973).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Meijer, G. Acta Bot. Neerl. 17, 9–14 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Garner, W. W. & Allard, H. A. J. Agric. Res. 42, 629–651 (1931).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sinclair, T. R. & Lemon, E. R. Solar Energy 15, 89–97 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Holmes, M. G. & Smith, H. Photochem. Photobiol. 25, 539–545 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Gallagher, J. N., Biscoe, P. V. & Saffell, R. A. J. exp. Bot. 27, 704–716 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Morgan, D. C. thesis, Univ. Nottingham (1978).

  12. McCree, K. J. Agric. Meteorol. 10, 443–453 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MORGAN, D., SMITH, H. Simulated sunflecks have large, rapid effects on plant stem extension. Nature 273, 534–536 (1978). https://doi.org/10.1038/273534a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/273534a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing