Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Blood-sucking flies and primate polyspecific associations

Abstract

PRIMATE polyspecific associations are likely to be an effective means of reducing the number of fly bites individual monkeys receive1. The probability of acquiring a vector-borne disease, and the severity of that disease increases with the number of fly bites an animal receives2–4. Bait animals placed in groups are known to attract fewer individual mosquitoes per bait individual than are bait animals placed singly3,5. Mean group size of the mangabey, Cercocebus albigena is about 13 in Kibale Forest, Uganda, and the mean group size of Colobus badius and Cercopithecus ascanius are 50 and 35 respectively6. Associations of groups of these species are likely to reduce significantly the number of dipteran bites individual monkeys receive1,7. Other explanations proposed for primate polyspecific associations include increased food location abilities, and increased predator detection and avoidance8,9. I report here the correlation of the temporal occurrence of C. albigena polyspecific associations with the activity of biting and sucking flies, C. albigena feeding and other activities, and the temporal occurrence of attacks by the crowned eagle-hawk (Stephanoaetus coronatus) (eagles are the only known predator of these monkeys). The study was carried out in the Kibale Forest, Ngogo Reserve.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Freeland, W. J. Biotropica 8, 12–24 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Willett, K. C. Ann. trop. Med Parasitol. 50, 75–80 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Reid, J. A. Bull. ent. Res. 52, 43–62 (1961).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Hewitt, R. Bird malaria (John Hopkins, Baltimore, 1940).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Haddow, J. A. Bull. ent. Res. 33, 91–142 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Struhsaker, T. T. (in the press).

  7. Hamilton, W. D. J theor. Biol. 31, 295–311 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Struhsaker, T. T. The Red Colobus Monkey (University of Chicago Press, Chicago. 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Gartlan, J. S. & Struhsaker, T. T. J. zool. Soc. Lond. 168, 221–266 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Haddow, A. J., Gillett, J. D. & Highton, R. B. Bull. ent. Res. 37, 301–320 (1947).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gautier, J. P. & Gautier-Hion, A. La Terre et la Vie 116, 164–201 (19xx).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Haddow, A. J. Proc. zool. Soc. Lond. 122, 297–394 (1952).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

FREELAND, W. Blood-sucking flies and primate polyspecific associations. Nature 269, 801–802 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/269801a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/269801a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing