Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Daunorubicin and adriamycin facilitate actinomycin D binding to poly(dA–dT)·poly(dA–dT)

Abstract

ACTINOMYCIN D (Fig. 1a) binds to DNA by intercalation of the phenoxazone ring between adjacent base pairs of the double helix1–4. There is a general requirement for a guanine base at the actinomycin D binding site on DNA, as illustrated by the observation that actinomycin D does not intercalate into double-stranded (ds) poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) (refs 1–4). Daunorubicin, adriamycin (Fig. 1b) and ethidium bromide (Fig. 1c) also intercalate into dsDNA, but in contrast to actinomycin D, these drugs do not show any requirement for a particular base at the intercalation site5,6. Both actinomycin D and ethidium bromide do, however, show definite preferences for binding to certain sequences of nucleic acid bases at the intercalation site7–11. In this report we show that daunorubicin and adriamycin facilitate strong binding of actinomycin D to poly(dA-dT)·poly(dA-dT) and we discuss the implications of this new observation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Meienhofer, J., Atherton, E. Adv. appl. Microbiol. 13, 203–300 (1976).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Sobell, H. M. Prog. Nucl. Acids Res. 13, 140–153 (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Goldberg, I. H. & Friedman, P. A. A. Rev. Biochem. 40, 775–810 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Wells, R. D. in Progress in Molecular and Subcellular Biology, 2 (ed. Hahn, F. E.) 21–32 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1971).

    Google Scholar 

  5. LePecq, J.-B. Meth. Biochem. Anal. 20, 41 (1971).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Henry, D. W. in Cancer Chemotherapy (ed. Sartorelli, A. C.) Am. Chem. Soc. Symp. Ser. 30, 15–57 (1976).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Krugh, T. R. Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A. 69, 1911–1915 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Krugh, T. R. & Neely, J. W. Biochemistry 12, 4418–4425 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Krugh, T. R. & Reinhardt, C. G. J. molec. Biol. 97, 133–162 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Reinhardt, C. G. thesis, Univ. Rochester (1977).

  11. Chen Chiao, Y-C. & Krugh, T. R. Biochemistry 16, 747–755 (1977).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hollstein, U. Chem. Rev. 74, 625–652 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Krugh, T. R., Wittlin, F. N. & Cramer, S. P. Biopolymers 14, 197–210 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Crothers, D. M., Sabol, S. L., Ratner, D. I. & Muller, W. Biochemistry 7, 1817–1823 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Yamaoka, K. & Ziffer, H. Biochemistry 7, 1001–1008 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Homer, R. B. Archs Biochem. Biophys. 129, 405–407.

  17. Quadrifoglio, F. & Crescenzi, V. Biophys. Chem. 2, 64–69 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Arcamone, F. et al. in International Symposium on Adriamycin (eds. Cart, S. K. et al.) 9–22 (Springer-Verlag, New York, 1972).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  19. Auer, H. E., Pawlowski-Konopnicki, B. E. & Krugh, T. R. FEBS Lett. 73, 167–170 (1976).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Burd, J. F., Wartell, R. M., Dodgson, J. B. & Wells, R. D. J. biol. Chem. 250, 5109–5113 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Burd, J. F., Larson, J. E. & Wells, R. D. J. biol. Chem. 250, 6002–6007 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Early, T. E., Kearns, D. R., Burd, J. F., Larson, J. E. & Wells, R. D. Biochemistry 16, 541–541 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Patel, D. J. Biochemistry 13, 2396–2402 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Reinhardt, C. G. & Krugh, T. R. Biochemistry 16, 2890–2895 (1977).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Di Marco, A., Arcamone, F. Arzneimitt. Forsch. 25, 368–375 (1975).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  26. Bachur, N. R. in Cancer Chemotherapy (ed. Sartorelli, A. C.) Am. Chem. Soc. Ser. 30, 58–70 (1976).

    Book  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

KRUGH, T., YOUNG, M. Daunorubicin and adriamycin facilitate actinomycin D binding to poly(dA–dT)·poly(dA–dT). Nature 269, 627–628 (1977). https://doi.org/10.1038/269627a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/269627a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing