Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Is drug inhibition of dopamine uptake a misinterpretation of in vitro experiments?

Abstract

COYLE and Snyder1 reported that various antiparkinson drugs inhibit the uptake of labelled dopamine (DA) into striatal synaptosomes. They suggested that these drugs may act in part by a potentiation of dopaminergic neurotransmission caused by inhibition of DA uptake. Measurement of drug effects on the uptake of labelled DA into slices or synaptosomes from the corpus striatum has become a widely used test for the evaluation of drugs affecting central dopaminergic functions. Some observations made in our laboratory, however, suggest that the apparent reduction of 3H-DA uptake caused by a variety of drugs in in vitro experiments may, in fact, be the result of a DA-depleting action. Benztropine and nomifensine are said to be potent DA-uptake inhibitors2; however, in our experience, benztropine (30 mg kg−1 subcutaneously) does not inhibit, and nomifensine (100 mg kg−1 orally) only slightly inhibits, the uptake of 3H-DA into striatal synaptosomes prepared from rats pretreated 1 h before killing. In contrast, pretreatment with tricyclic antidepressants does inhibit NA and 5-hydroxytryptamine (5-HT) uptake into midbrain synaptosomes3. Using the method of Farnebo4, we studied the effects of benztropine, haloperidol, chlorpromazine, d-amphetamine, piroheptine5 and cocaine on the release of tritium from field-stimulated, 3H-DA-prelabelled striatal slices. We observed that, at concentrations between 10−6M and 10−5M, these drugs increase the spontaneous release of tritium soon after their addition to the superfusion medium.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Coyle, J. T., and Snyder, S. H., Science, 166, 899–901 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hunt, P., Kannengiesser, M. H., and Raynaud, J. P., J. Pharm. Pharmac., 26, 370–371 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Maitre, L., Waldmeier, P. C., Baumann, P. A., and Staehelin, M., Adv. Biochem. Psychopharmac., 10, 297–304 (1974).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Farnebo, L. O., Acta physiol. scand. Suppl., 371, 19–27 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ohashi, T., Akita, H., Tamura, T., Noda, K., and Honda, F., ArzneimittelForsch., 22 966–972 (1972).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Whittaker, V. P., in Handbook of Neurochemistry, 2, (edit. by Lajtha, A.), 327–364 (Plenum, New York, London, 1969).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  7. Besson, M. J., Cheramy, A., Feltz, P., and Glowinski, J., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 62, 741–748 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Waldmeier, P., DeHerdt, P., and Maitre, L., Clin. Chem., 20, 81–83 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Stein, L. A., and Wise, C. D., J. comp. Physiol. Psychol., 67, 189–198 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Tilson, H. A., and Sparber, S. B., J. Pharmac. exp. Ther., 181, 387–398 (1972).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Orlansky, H., and Heikkila, R. E., Eur. J. Pharmac., 29, 284–291 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Heikkila, R. E., Orlansky, H., and Cohen, G., Biochem. Pharmac., 24, 847–852 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

BAUMANN, P., MAITRE, L. Is drug inhibition of dopamine uptake a misinterpretation of in vitro experiments?. Nature 264, 789–790 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/264789a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/264789a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing