Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Effects of artificial selection on reproductive fitness in Drosophila

Abstract

A COMMON feature of many selection experiments, when polygenically determined traits are involved, is a reduction in the reproductive fitness of the selected strains. Experimental selection for differences in the numbers of abdominal bristles and sternopleural chaetae in Drosophila melanogaster produced sterility and a reduction in fertility in the selected strains1,2. Latter3 found that the “competitive index” (mating propensity, female fecundity and survival ability) had fallen sharply in strains of D. melanogaster subjected to experimental selection for differences in scutellar bristle number. Selection in Tribolium for change in developmental rates produced alterations in productivity, body size and viability of the flour beetles4. The reproductive fitness of chickens under selection for increased shank length was reduced steadily throughout the selection process5.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mather, K., and Harrison, B. J., Heredity, 3, 1–52, and 131–162 (1949).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Wigan, L. G., and Mather, K., Ann. Eugen., 11, 354–364 (1942).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Latter, B. D. H., Genet. Res., 8, 205–218 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Dawson, P. S., Genetics, 37, 63–77 (1966).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Lerner, I. M., and Dempster, E. R., Heredity, 5, 75–94 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Lerner, I. M., Genetic Homeostasis (Wiley, New York, 1954).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Dobzhansky, T., and Spassky, B., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 48, 1704–1712 (1962); 62, 75–80 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Watanabe, T. K., and Anderson, W. W., Behav. Genet., 6, 71–86 (1976).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Hirsch, J., J. comp. Physiol. Psychol., 52, 304–308 (1959).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Hadler, N. M., Biol. Bull., 126, 264–273 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Novitski, E., and Rush, G., Drosophila Inf. Serv., 22: 75–76 (1948).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Latter, B. D. H., and Robertson, A., Genet. Res., 3, 110–138 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. King, H. D., J. exp. Zool., 26, 335–378 (1918).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

PYLE, D. Effects of artificial selection on reproductive fitness in Drosophila. Nature 263, 317–319 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/263317a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/263317a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing