Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Are reptilian pulmonary receptors mechano- or chemosensitive?

Abstract

BOTH birds and mammals possess pulmonary receptors which increase discharge in phase with each inspiration1–5. In mammals the adequate stimulus of these receptors seems to be the total transpulmonary pressure which varies with both inflation volume and rate and sign of the volume change6. The lungs of birds, however, consist of a complex system of air tubes7,8 and unlike those of mammals are relatively inexpansible. Many avian pulmonary receptors have no mechanosensitivity, the adequate stimulus being the changes in airway CO2 throughout the breathing cycle9–12. So rate and degree of inflation of the respiratory system is signalled by different sensory modalities in birds and mammals. The demonstration that mammalian pulmonary receptors are partially inhibited by high alveolar CO2 (refs 13–15) and that some avian receptors may be mechanosensitive16,17 suggests that in the more phylogenetically ancient vertebrate classes it might be possible to locate a pulmonary receptor which has distinct mechano- and chemosensitive properties, thereby allowing speculation on the evolution of the avian and mammalian receptor types.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. King, A. S., Molony, V., McLelland, J., Bowsher, D. R., and Mortimer, M. F., Experientia, 24, 1017–1018 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Jones, D. R., Comp. Biochem. Physiol., 28, 961–965 (1969).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Fedde, M. R., and Peterson, D. F., J. Physiol., Lond., 209, 609–625 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Adrian, E. D., J. Physiol., Lond., 79, 332–358 (1933).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Paintal, A. S., Physiol. Rev., 53, 159–227 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Davis, H. L., Fowler, W. S., and Lambert, E. H., Am. J. Physiol., 187, 558–566 (1956).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. King, A. S., Int. Rev. gen. exp. Zool., 2, 171–267 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dunker, H. R., Ergebn. Anat. Entw. Gesch., 45, 1–171 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  9. Fedde, M. R., Gatz, R. N., Slama, H., and Scheid, P., Resp. Physiol., 22, 99–114 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fedde, M. R., Gatz, R. N., Slama, H., and Scheid, P., Resp. Physiol., 22, 115–122 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Osborne, J. L., and Burger, R. E., Resp. Physiol., 22, 77–86 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Burger, R. E., Osborne, J. L., and Banzett, R. B., Resp. Physiol., 22, 87–98 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Mustafa, M. E. K. Y., and Purves, M. J., Resp. Physiol., 16, 197–212 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Schoener, E. P., and Frankel, H. M., Am. J. Physiol., 222, 68–72 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Sant'Ambrogio, G., Miserocchi, G., and Mortola, J., Resp. Physiol., 22, 191–198 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Molony, V., Resp. Physiol., 22, 57–76 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Leitner, L. M., Resp. Physiol., 16, 232–244 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Lenfant, C., Johansen, K., Petersen, J. A., and Schmidt-Nielsen, K., Resp. Physiol., 8, 261–275 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Gans, C., and Hughes, G. M., J. exp. Biol., 47, 1–20 (1967).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gatz, R. N., Fedde, M. R., and Crawford, E. C., Jr, Experientia, 31, 455–456 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Petersen, D. F., and Fedde, M. R., Science, 162, 1499–1501 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  22. Bartoli, A., et al., J. Physiol., Lond., 240, 91–110 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MILSOM, W., JONES, D. Are reptilian pulmonary receptors mechano- or chemosensitive?. Nature 261, 327–328 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/261327a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/261327a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing