Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Extremely low frequency, weak electric fields affect schedule-controlled behaviour of monkeys

Abstract

THE effect of weak electric fields on behaviour of orgasnims has potentially important implications for basic neurophysiology and evaluation of environmental hazards (chronic exposure to weak 60-Hz electric fields has become a way of life). We have demonstrated1 that weak (approximately 7 V m−1 p–p), extremely low frequency (7 Hz) electric fields could modify a lever-press response in monkeys. We summarise here data2 confirming that finding for a larger group of animals with more replications and presenting evidence for a dose-dependent relationship for 7-Hz fields. In addition there are indications of a threshold of 10–56 V m−1 p–p for field frequencies higher than electroencephalogram (EEG) range (1–32 Hz). Adey3 has hypothesised that since these field levels areclearly too low to trigger synapsesinthe fashion prescribed by classical neurophysiology, more subtle membrane sensitivities may be functioning as central nervous system mediators of the observed behavioural effects. One possible mediator is the degree of calcium efflux across the membrane4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Gavalas, R. J., Walter, D. O., Hamer, J., and Adey, W. R., Brain Res., 18 491–501 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Gavalas-Medici, R., and Day-Magdaleno, S. R., Office of Naval Research, Washington, DC, Technical Report, National Technical Information Service No. AD-008-404/6GA (1975).

    Google Scholar 

  3. Adey, W. R., in Functional Linkage in Biomolecular Systems (edit. by Schmitt, F. O., Schneider, D. M., and Crothers, D. M.), 325–342 (Raven, New York, 1975).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Bawin, S., Kaczmarek, L. K., and Adey, W. R., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 247, 74–80 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Skinner, B. F., The Behaviour of Organisms: An Experimental Analysis (Appleton-Century-Crofts, New York, 1938).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Sidman, M., Science, 122, 925 (1955).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Valentino, A. R., IITRI, 835 K St, NW, Washington, DC, Naval Electronics Systems Command, Technical Memorandum, Project No. I1TRIE. 6249 (July 17, 1972).

  8. Keeton, W. T., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 68, 102–106 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bullock, T. H., in Handbook of Sensory Physiology III (edit. by Fessard, A.) (Springer, New York, in press).

  10. Wever, R., Z. vergl. Physiol., 56, 111–128 (1967).

    Google Scholar 

  11. deLorge, J., Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Pensacola, Florida, 1155 (November, 1972).

    Google Scholar 

  12. deLorge, J., Naval Aerospace Medical Research Laboratory, Pensacola, Florida, 1196 (November, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  13. Hamer, J., Commun. Behav. Biol., 2(2), part A, 217–222 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  14. Konig, H., Ankermuller, F., Naturwissenschaften, 21, 486–490 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Marr, M. J., Rivers, W. K., Burns, C. P., Office of Naval Research, Washington, DC, Final Report (1973).

    Google Scholar 

  16. Kaczmarek, L. K., Adey, W. R., Brain Res., 63, 331–342 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Bawin, S., Kaczmarek, L. K., Adey, W. R., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 247, 74–80 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Grodsky, J., Ann. N.Y. Acad. Sci., 247, 117–124 (1974).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GAVALAS-MEDICI, R., DAY-MAGDALENO, S. Extremely low frequency, weak electric fields affect schedule-controlled behaviour of monkeys. Nature 261, 256–259 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/261256a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/261256a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing