Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Mutation frequency at a recessive locus in haploid and diploid strains of a slime mould

Abstract

IT is puzzling that mutants are isolated at a similar frequency in tissue cultures of haploid and diploid strains1–3, for twice as many mutations have often been assumed necessary to produce a mutant diploid as to produce a mutant haploid. Explanations for the apparent high frequency of mutation in diploids1–6 include epigenetic effects1–3, changes in gene dose7, dominant mutations8, recessive X-linked mutations4 and heterozygosity before selection9. Most recessive autosomal mutants are assumed to arise because of haploidy for the chromosome containing the mutant locus, since most cell cultures are aneuploid4,10,11. It is difficult to measure the mutation frequency at recessive loci in cultured haploid and diploid strains because of the paucity of haploid strains and the problems caused by aneuploidy. The slime mould Dictyostelium discoideum, a simple eukaryote, is suitable for this purpose, however, as both haploid and diploid strains are available12–14 and aneuploids are so unstable or inviable that none has been isolated14. Using this organism, I have found, contrary to the expectation that mutant diploids should be extremely rare (say 2 × 10−12 diploid, 10−6 haploid )1–6, that the difference in mutation frequency between haploids and diploids for one recessive locus is only an order of magnitude.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Harris, M., J. cell. Physiol., 78, 177–184 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mezger-Freed, L., J. Cell Biol., 51, 742–751 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Mezger-Freed, L., Nature new Biol., 235, 245–246 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Chu, E. H. Y., Genetics, 78, 115–132 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  5. Terzi, M., Genetics and the Animal Cell (Wiley, London and New York, 1974).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Thompson, L. H., and Baker, R. M., in Methods in Cell Biology, 6 (edit. by Prescott, D. M.), 209–281 (Academic, New York, 1973).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Terzi, M., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 5027–5031 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Baker, R. M., et al., Cell, 1, 9–21 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Rappaport, H., and DeMars, R., Genetics, 75, 335–345 (1973).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Chasin, L. A., and Urlab, G., Science, 187, 1091–1093 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Caboche, M., Genetics, 77, 309–322 (1974).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Ross, I. K., Am. J. Bot., 47, 54–59 (1960).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Katz, E. R., and Sussman, M., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 69, 495–498 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Brody, T., and Williams, K. L., J. gen. Microbiol., 82, 371–383 (1974).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Williams, K. L., Kessin, R. H., and Newell, P. C., J. gen. Microbiol., 84, 59–69 (1974).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Rothman, F. G., and Alexander, E. T., Genetics, 80, 715–731 (1975).

    CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  17. Mosses, D., Williams, K. L., and Newell, P. C., J. gen. Microbiol., 90, 247–259 (1975).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Katz, E. R., and Kao, V., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 71, 4025–4026 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  19. Jain, H. K., Raut, R. N., and Khamankar, Y. G., Heredity, 23, 247–256 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WILLIAMS, K. Mutation frequency at a recessive locus in haploid and diploid strains of a slime mould. Nature 260, 785–786 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/260785a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/260785a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing