Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Cross tolerance between morphine and methionine-enkephalin

Abstract

TOLERANCE and dependence are characteristic symptoms in man during prolonged use of opiates. We have pointed out1 that for an understanding of these phenomena the interaction between endogenous enkephalin and exogenous opiates is of importance. Normally, enkephalin can be assumed to control inhibitory mechanisms determining the rate of neurotransmitter release. If, however, opiates are administered with the intent of increasing the effects of these inhibitory mechanisms, then control will pass from the endogenous enkephalin to the exogenous opiates. Since tachyphylaxis is a pharmacological characteristic of opiates, a state of tolerance will arise in which increasing amounts of opiates will be required to maintain the desired effect. As an important step in the elucidation of the mechanism of action of enkephalin, it was necessary to establish whether cross tolerance between enkephalin and opiates is found in morphine-tolerant animals. This point was tested in two morphine-sensitive models, the myenteric plexus-longitudinal muscle preparation from the guinea pig ileum2,3 and the mouse vas deferens4. As natural enkephalin consists of about 75% methionine–enkephalin and 25% leucine–enkephalin5, the relative potencies of synthetic methionine–enkephalin and morphine were compared in preparations obtained from animals with different degrees of tolerance. Cross tolerance between morphine and methionine–enkephalin was shown to occur in the two preparations obtained from animals implanted with morphine pellets.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kosterlitz, H. W., and Hughes, J., Life Sci., 17, 91–96 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Cowie, A. L., Kosterlitz, H. W., and Watt, A. J., Nature, 220, 1040–1042 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Paton, W. D. M., and Zar, M. A., J. Physiol., Lond., 194, 13–33 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Hughes, J., Kosterlitz, H. W., and Leslie, F. M., Br. J. Pharmac., 53, 371–381 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hughes, J., et al., Nature, 258, 577–579 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Klee, W. A., and Streaty, R. A., Nature, 248, 61–63 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Goldstein, A., and Schulz, R., Br. J. Pharmac., 48, 655–666 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Schulz, R., Cartwright, C., and Goldstein, A., Nature, 251, 329–331 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kosterlitz, H. W., Lydon, R. J., and Watt, A. J., Br. J. Pharmac., 39, 398–413 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Kosterlitz, H. W., and Watt, A. J., Br. J. Pharmac. Chemother., 33, 266–276 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Collier, H. O. J., Francis, D. L., McDonald-Gibson, W. J., Roy, A. C., and Saeed, S. A., Life Sci., 17, 85–90 (1975).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Sharma, S. K., Klee, W. A., and Niremberg, M., Proc. natn. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 72, 3092–3096 (1975).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

WATERFIELD, A., HUGHES, J. & KOSTERLITZ, H. Cross tolerance between morphine and methionine-enkephalin. Nature 260, 624–625 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/260624a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/260624a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing