Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

No anisotropy in angular diameter–redshift relationship

Abstract

USING data for the brightest cluster galaxies, we here consider whether any anisotropy exists in the angular diameter–redshift relationship. This is in response to the finding of Rubin et al.1, who described a ‘curious’ distribution of radial velocities for ScI type galaxies having apparent magnitudes m in the range 14 < m < 15. For two distinct regions of sky, the mean radial velocity for these galaxies differs by 1,400 km s−1; the corresponding mean apparent magnitude differs by 0 mag, compared with the difference of 0.5 mag expected on the basis of this velocity difference. They tentatively concluded that the Hubble parameter H is not isotropic.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Rubin, V. C., Ford, W. K., and Rubin, J. S., Astrophys. J. Lett., 183, L111–L115 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Le Denmat, G., and Vigier, J.-P., C. r. hebd. Séanc. Acad. Sci. Paris, 280 B, 459–461 (1975).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Kowal, C. T., and Sargent, W. L. W., Astr. J., 76, 756–764 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Jaakkola, T., Karoji, H., Moles, M., and Vigier, J.-P., Nature, 256, 24–25 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Sandage, A., Astrophys. J., 173, 485–499 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Sandage, A., and Tammann, G., Astrophys. J., 197, 265–280 (1975).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Sandage, A., and Tammann, G., Astrophys. J., 194, 559–568 (1974).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Sandage, A., Astrophys. J., 178, 1–24 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Penston, M. V., and Rowan-Robinson, M., Nature, 213, 375–377 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

EVANS, A., HART, D. No anisotropy in angular diameter–redshift relationship. Nature 259, 468–469 (1976). https://doi.org/10.1038/259468a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/259468a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing