Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

LSD treatment of Pieris brassicae and consequences on the progeny

Abstract

AT 20° C, under white light illumination and circadian rhythm, nymphal diapause of Pieris brassicae is dependent on a short 9-h photophase. Some psychodysleptics (mesca-line sulphate and LSD), when injected during the photo-sentitive larval period, suppress diapause induction as if the larvae were subjected to a long 16-h photophase1. Abnormalities in the behaviour of the progeny of treated animals were observed. We studied them for three generations after the treatment.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Vuillaume, M., and Seugé, J., Bull. biol., 116, (3) 285 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Jagiello, G., and Polani, P. E., Cytagenetics, 8, 136 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Skakkebaek, N. E., and Philip, J., Science, 160, 1246 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Skakkebaek, N. E., J. Reprod. Fert., 22, 141 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hulten, M., Lindsten, J., Lidberg, L., and Ekelund, H., Ann. Genet., 1, 201 (1968).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Chibon, P., and Belanger, M., C. r. Acad. Sci. série D, Paris, 274, 80 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

VUILLAUME, M., BERKALOFF, A. LSD treatment of Pieris brassicae and consequences on the progeny. Nature 251, 314–315 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/251314a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/251314a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing