Abstract
PHEROMONES function by transmitting information from a sending to a receiving organism by chemical means. In a classic paper, Bossert and Wilson classified the effects of such information transfer into releasing and priming1. Releaser pheromones evoke an immediate overt behavioural effect, whereas primer pheromones activate the chemoreceptor in such a way as to alter the physiology of the receiving organism1,2. In general, studies involving the isolation identification of pheromones have concentrated on releasers such as sex attractants, alarm pheromones, trail pheromones and aggregation pheromones3. The advantage of using releaser pheromones in such studies is that the behavioural effects can be observed even in a single individual of the appropriate age, sex and species. This makes the development of a relatively simple and rapid bioassay a straightforward process. So far the important exception to the use of releaser pheromones has been the work of Butler et al. showing that 9-ketodecenoic acid inhibits ovarian development in worker bees4. This substance, however, was first identified as the sex attractant of the queen bee and later shown to have a primer effect. We describe here a bioassay for a substance with an effect which does not fit easily into either the releaser or primer category.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bossert, W. H., and Wilson, E. O., J. theor. Biol., 5, 443 (1963).
Wilson, E. O., in Chemical ecology (edit. by Sondheimer, E., and Simone, J. B.), 133 (Academic Press, New York, 1970).
Regnier, F. E., and Law, J. H., A. Rev. Biochem., 40, 533 (1971).
Butler, C. G., Symp. R. Ent. Soc. London, 2, 66 (1964).
Petit, C., and Ehrman, L., Evolut. Biol., 3, 177 (1969).
Ehrman, L., Am. Naturalist, 101, 415 (1967).
Ehrman, L., Behav. Genet., 2, 69 (1972).
Elens, A., and Wattiaux, J., Drosophila Info. Service, 39, 118 (1964).
Conolly, K., Burnet, B., and Sewell, D., Evolution, 23, 548 (1969).
Ewing, A., and Manning, A., A. Rev. Ent., 12, 471 (1967).
Grossfield, J., Univ. Texas Publ., No. 6818, 147 (1968).
Wilson, E. O., Science, 172, 406 (1971).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
LEONARD, J., EHRMAN, L. & SCHORSCH, M. Bioassay of a Drosophila pheromone influencing sexual selection. Nature 250, 261–262 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/250261a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/250261a0
This article is cited by
-
Cuticular Hydrocarbons: Their Evolution and Roles in Drosophila Pheromonal Communication
Behavior Genetics (2005)
-
Unraveling the Nature of Individual Recognition by Odor in Hermit Crabs
Journal of Chemical Ecology (2005)
-
Role of visual and auditory cues in mating behavior of two desert species ofDrosophila
Experientia (1981)
-
Rare male advantages amongDrosophila of the same laboratory strain
Behavior Genetics (1980)
-
Inbreeding and mating patterns inDrosophila pseudoobscura
Behavior Genetics (1979)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.