Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Is texture-density contrast an inhibition or an adaptation?

Abstract

MACKAY'S recent experiments on texture-density contrast1 are an interesting contribution to the current, rapidly-growing literature on ‘feature-specific inhibition’ in the visual system. There have been suggestions, based mainly on psychophysical evidence, that there is mutual inhibition between ‘channels’ selective for binocular disparity2, orientation3,4 and spatial frequency5,6. It is known that many neurones in the visual cortex respond selectively to particular values on these three dimensions7–9 (as well as others, such as direction and velocity). Our knowledge of lateral inhibition at earlier levels in the visual pathway indicates that mutual inhibition between such multi-channel neurons would account for a wide range of visual effects.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. MacKay, D. M., Nature, 245, 159 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Richards, W., Vision Res., 12, 1113 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Blakemore, C., Carpenter, R. H. S., and Georgeson, M. A., Nature, 228, 37 (1970).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blakemore, C., Tobin, E. A., Expl. Brain Res., 15, 439 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Georgeson, M. A., Nature, 245, 43 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Tolhurst, D. J., J. Physiol., Lond., 226, 231 (1972).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Blakemore, C., J. Physiol., Lond., 209, 155 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Hubel, D. H., and Wiesel, T. N., J. Physiol., Lond., 195, 215 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Maffei, L., and Fiorentini, A., Vision Res., 13, 1255 (1973).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Fiorentini, A., and Maffei, L., Vision Res., 11, 1299 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Blakemore, C., and Sutton, P., Science, 166, 245 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Blakemore, C., and Nachmias, J., J. Physiol., 213, 157 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anstis, S. M., Am. J. Psychol., (in the press).

  14. Coltheart, M., Nature new Biol., 231, 256 (1971).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Blakemore, C., Carpenter, R. H. S., and Georgeson, M. A., Nature, 234, 418 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GEORGESON, M. Is texture-density contrast an inhibition or an adaptation?. Nature 249, 85–86 (1974). https://doi.org/10.1038/249085a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/249085a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing