Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Discrepant Redshifts of QSOs in Clusters of Galaxies and a Close QSO Pair

Abstract

ALTHOUGH it is the majority view that QSO redshifts are cosmological in origin and related to distance by Hubble's law, several workers1–3 have proposed that QSOs may be more local objects. The strongest direct evidence for the conventional view is provided by observations of a number of QSOs which have been shown to have redshifts (z) which agree to within about 1% with the redshifts of apparently associated clusters of galaxies4–8. These QSO-cluster associations have all been found in searches restricted to QSOs with z<0.36 since on the cosmological hypothesis it is only for such low values of z that the associated galaxies would be readily visible. But, as Burbidge and O'Dell9 have pointed out, by assuming at the outset that the redshifts are cosmological these investigations fail to test the non-cosmological hypothesis. For the past several years we have been attempting to carry out a study of QSOs in clusters or groups which would be free from this objection. Although our results are by no means complete, we present here some of our preliminary findings as they seem to be of relevance to the present controversy.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Terrell, J., Science, N.Y., 145, 918 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Hoyle, F., Burbidge, G. R., and Sargent, W. L. W., Nature, 208, 751 (1966).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hoyle, F., and Burbidge, G. R., Astrophys. J., 144, 534 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Bahcall, J. N., Schmidt, M., and Gunn, J. E., Astrophys. J. Lett., 157, L77 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Gunn, J. E., Astrophys. J. Lett., 164, L113 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Oemler, A., Gunn, J. E., and Oke, J. B., Astrophys. J. Lett., 171, L83 (1972).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Robinson, L. B., and Wampler, E. J., Astrophys. J. Lett., 171, L83 (1972).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Miller, J. S., Robinson, L. B., and Wampler, E. J., Astrophys. J. Lett., 179, L83 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Burbidge, G. R., and O'Dell, S. L., Astrophys. J. Lett., 182, L47 (1973).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Jauncey, D. L., and Hazard, C., Astrophys. Lett., 7, 1 (1970).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Burbidge, E. M., Burbidge, G. R., Solomon, P. M., and Strittmater, P. A., Astrophys. J., 170, 233 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Hazard, C., Jauncey, D. L., and Backer, D. C., Astr. J., 75, 1039 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Clarke, M. E., Bolton, J. G., and Shimmins, A. J., Aust. J. Phys., 19, 375 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Olsen, E. T., Astr. J., 75, 764 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Lynds, C. R., and Wills, D., Astrophys. J., 172, 531 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Baldwin, J. A., Burbidge, E. M., Hazard, C., Murdoch, H. S., Robinson, L. B., and Wampler, E. J., Ap. J. (in the press, 1973).

  17. Wampler, E. J., Baldwin, J. A., Burke, W. L., Robinson, L. B., and Hazard, C., Nature, 246, 203 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Wills, D., and Bolton, J. G., Aust. J. Phys., 22, 775 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Hoskins, D. G., Murdoch, H. S., Hazard, C., and Jauncey, D. L., Aust. J. Phys., 25, 559 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  20. Schmidt, M., Astrophys. J., 176, 273 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  21. Stockton, A. N., Nature phys. Sci., 238, 37 (1972).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

HAZARD, C., JAUNCEY, D., SARGENT, W. et al. Discrepant Redshifts of QSOs in Clusters of Galaxies and a Close QSO Pair. Nature 246, 205–208 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/246205a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/246205a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing