Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Structure of the Terrestrial Planets

Abstract

BULLEN1 has suggested that to reconcile known data for Venus, Earth and Mars with the hypothesis that they have the same overall composition, the outer core of the Earth may be composed of Fe2O. The principal reason seems to be the resolution of an alleged discrepancy between the modern solid radius of Venus determined by radar2, 6,053.7±2.2 km and the value of 6,270 km computed by Bullen on the phase-change hypothesis for the core3. But this latter value was arrived at on the basis of somewhat approximate calculations, whereas more accurate calculations4 find no discrepancy of any significance in interpreting Venus as possessed of three main zones with mechanical-elastic properties the same as in the corresponding zones of the Earth. In such calculations some allowance for the existence in Venus of a small inner core could readily be made, but it is clear that no adjustment for such an inner core, which in the Earth has volume only 0.76% of the whole, could seriously affect the computed value of the overall radius. For if the inner core were completely annihilated and the Earth contracted down geometrically without change of volume of the remainder, the outer radius would shrink only by 16 km, so that averaging of its properties with those of the main bulk of the core would produce negligible change of radius, whereas Bullen's discrepancy is over 200 km.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bullen, K. E., Nature, 243, 68 (1973).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Ash, M. E., et al., Science, 160, 985 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bullen, K. E., Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 110, 256 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Lyttleton, R. A., Astrophys. Space Sci., 5, 18 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Ringwood, A. E., Geochim. cosmochim. Acta, 26, 457 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Ramsey, W. H., Mon. Not. R. astr. Soc., 110, 325 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Lyttleton, R. A., Proc. R. Soc., A, 296, 285 (1965).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Rabe, E., Astr. J., 55, 112 (1950).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Rabe, E., and Francis, M. P., Astr. J., 72, 316 and 862 (1967).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LYTTLETON, R. Structure of the Terrestrial Planets. Nature 246, 84–85 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/246084a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/246084a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing