Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Yellowstone Convection Plume and Break-up of the Western United States

Abstract

MUCH of the late Cainozoic history of the western United States is characterized by tensional rifting. The Basin and Range Province is a zone of rifting 300 to 600 km wide (Fig. 1). The Rio Grande depression and the Snake River downwarp are areas of rifting which are similar in time and style to the Basin and Range faulting. The rifting in the Rio Grande depression has usually been related to the same causative mechanism as in the Basin and Range. The Basin and Range type faulting has variously been explained as the result of a westward moving convection cell1; as part of a wide, soft boundary reflecting the transform motion of the American and Pacific plates2; or as the result of a large mantle diapir which came up under the crust following the complete subduction of the Farallon plate in that region3. Although most of these explanations adequately account for the Basin and Range faulting, they fall short in explaining the rifting in the Rio Grande depression. None of the three hypotheses adequately explains why extensive rifting occurs over a area 600 km wide in the Basin and Range abruptly stops for a length of 500 km in the Colorado Plateau area and then resumes again in a narrow zone in the Rio Grande region. The Snake River rifting transects the regional trend of the Basin and Range rifting and does not fit any of the proposed tectonic models for the Basin and Range.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cook, K. L., Tectonophysics, 8, 469 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Atwater, Tanya, Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 81, 3513 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Scholz, C. H., Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 82, (1971).

  4. Stone, G. T., thesis, Univ. Colorado (1967).

  5. Lafehr, T. R., and Pakiser, L. C., US Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper, 450 -D, 77 (1962).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Hill, D. P., Baldwin, H. L., and Pakiser, L. C., US Geol. Surv. Prof. Paper, 424 -B, B248 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Gaca, J. R., and Karig, D. E., US Geol. Surv. Open File Report (1956).

  8. Lipman, P. W., Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 80, 1343 (1969).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Deffeyes, K. S., Science Year—The Worldbook Science Annual 1973, 163 (1972).

  10. Morgan, W. J., Nature, 230, 42 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Coney, P. J., Nature, 233, 462 (1971).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Atwater, Tanya, Bull. Amer. Assoc. Petrol. Geol., 56, 385 (1972).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

MATTHEWS, V., ANDERSON, C. Yellowstone Convection Plume and Break-up of the Western United States. Nature 243, 158–159 (1973). https://doi.org/10.1038/243158a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/243158a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing