Abstract
MOST current literature on solar activity assumes that the planets do not affect it, and that conditions internal to the Sun are primarily responsible for the solar cycle. Bigg1, however, has shown that the period of Mercury's orbit appears in the sunspot data, and that the influence of Mercury depends on the phases of Venus, Earth, and Jupiter. These four are the “tidal planets”; their relative tidal heights raised on the Sun are Mercury 1.15 + 0.65, Venus 2.17 ± 0.04, Earth 1.00 ± 0.05, and Jupiter 2.28 ± 0.32. The ranges of values are due to the orbit eccentricities. No other planet raises a solar tide greater than 2% of the Earth's contribution. Here I discuss the relationships between planetary tides on the Sun and number of sunspots. The effects attributed to Mercury have been neglected because of their very short period of about 3 months compared with the period of the Sunspot cycle, which averages about 11.1 yr.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Bigg, E. K., Astron. J., 72, 463 (1967).
Lamb, Horace, Hydrodynamics, 359 (Cambridge Univ. Press, 1932).
H.M. Nautical Almanac Office, Planetary Coordinates (1933, 1958).
Tuckerman, B., Planetary, Lunar, and Solar Positions, AD 2 to AD 1649 (Phil. Soc. Amer., 1964).
Waldmeier, M., The Sunspot-Activity in the Years 1610–1960 (Technische Hochschule, Zurich, 1961).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
WOOD, K. Physical Sciences: Sunspots and Planets. Nature 240, 91–93 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/240091a0
Received:
Revised:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/240091a0
This article is cited by
-
Tidal Forcing on the Sun and the 11-Year Solar-Activity Cycle
Solar Physics (2023)
-
No Evidence for Absence of Solar Dynamo Synchronization
Solar Physics (2023)
-
Response to Comment on “Tidally Synchronized Solar Dynamo: A Rebuttal”
Solar Physics (2023)
-
A Synchronized Two-Dimensional $\alpha $–$\Omega $ Model of the Solar Dynamo
Solar Physics (2023)
-
Tidally Synchronized Solar Dynamo: A Rebuttal
Solar Physics (2022)
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.