Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Seismic Anisotropy in the Lower Oceanic Crust

Abstract

HESS1 suggested that upper mantle compressional wave velocities near the Mendocino and Molokai fracture zones of the Pacific vary with azimuth and this anisotropy is the result of preferred mineral orientation. Recent seismic refraction evidence indicates that in many regions the Earth's upper mantle is anisotropic2–4 and the observed Anisotropy in the upper mantle correlates well with laboratory studies of velocity Anisotropy in dunites and peridotites5,6. Although anisotropy complicates seismic refraction investigations its importance cannot be overestimated; it places severe limitations on probable upper mantle compositions and provides a means of estimating the stress fields which existed during the formation of preferred mineral orientation in the upper mantle.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hess, H. H., Nature, 203, 629 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Morris, G. B., Raitt, R. W., and Shor, jun., G. G., J. Geophys. Res., 74, 4300 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Raitt, R. W., Shor, jun., G. G., Francis, T. J. G., and Morris, G. B., J. Geophys. Res., 74, 3095 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Keen, C. E., and Barrett, D. L., Canad. J. Earth Sci., 8, 1056 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Christensen, N. I., J. Geophys. Res., 71, 5921 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Christensen, N. I., and Ramananantoandro, R., J. Geophys. Res., 76, 4003 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  7. Birch, F., J. Geophys. Res., 65, 1083 (1960).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Christensen, N. I., J. Geophys. Res., 70, 6147 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Dorman, L. M., Carnegie Institution Year Book 70, 349 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Raitt, R. W., The Sea (edit. by Hill, M. N.), 3, 85 (Interscience, NY, 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Furumoto, A. S., Campbell, J. F., and Hussong, D. M., Bull. Seism. Soc. Amer., 61, 147 (1971).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Ewing, J. I., Ludwig, W. J., Ewing, M., and Eittreim, S. L., J. Geophys. Res., 79, 7118 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

CHRISTENSEN, N. Seismic Anisotropy in the Lower Oceanic Crust. Nature 237, 450–451 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/237450a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/237450a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing