Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Radiation Pressure on a Test Particle in General Relativity

Abstract

RADIATION pressure is believed to be the dominant force on gas in or near quasi-stellar objects (QSOs) under some conditions1,2, and I have studied the acceleration of a particle to relativistic velocities by radiation pressure in an inverse-square (1/r2) radiation field with the gravitational force neglected2. But although arguments have been given3,4 that the line emission regions of QSOs are not close to Schwarzschild singularities, it is nevertheless possible that a small portion of the redshifts of QSOs may be gravitational, and it is also likely that highly ionized or stripped material lies close to the central source, where the effects of general relativity are larger. In Newtonian theory, both the radiation pressure and the gravitational force vary as r−2, so that a particle of constant cross-section σ released at rest is either swallowed up or driven out, independent of its initial location. Here, I show that according to general relativity the result is different. For stationary particles the force of radiation pressure varies more rapidly than that of gravity with changing distance r to the central source. This makes stable equilibria possible. Collective effects, the effects of time variations in the strength of the radiation field and the changing opacity of the gas may well dominate the general relativistic effect discussed here. Thus, I am not proposing that the emission or absorption clouds of QSOs are necessarily stabilized in this way, but rather pointing out the, presence of this stabilizing effect, in contrast with a previous suggestion in the literature5. Although Fowler and Hoyle5 do not explicitly state that stabilization could not occur in the relativistic case, they imply this by favourably comparing the stabilization in their model with that of a point source in the Newtonian approximation.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Scargle, J. D., Caroff, L. J., and Noerdlinger, P. D., Astrophys. J. Lett., 161, L115 (1970)

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Noerdlinger, P. D., Astrophys. Space Sci., 13, 70 (1971).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenstein, J. L., and Schmidt, M., Astrophys. J., 140, 1 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Schmidt, M., Ann. Revs. Astron. Astrophys., 7, 527 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Fowler, W. A., and Hoyle, F., Nature, 213, 373 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Vaidya, P. C., Nature, 171, 260 (1953).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  7. Kaufmann, W. J., Astrophys. J., 153, 849 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Lindquist, R. W., Schwartz, R. A., and Misner, C. W., Phys. Rev., 137, B1364 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Robertson, H. P., and Noonan, T. W., Relativity and Cosmology, Sections 4.4, 4.9 and 10.5 (Saunders, Philadelphia, 1968).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  10. Hubble, E. P., The Realm of the Nebulae, 182 (Yale University Press, 1936).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Sandage, A. R., J. Soc. ind. appl. Math., 10, 780 (1962).

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

NOERDLINGER, P. Radiation Pressure on a Test Particle in General Relativity. Nature 237, 30–31 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/237030a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/237030a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing