Abstract
THE severe outbreaks of Dutch elm disease (Ceratocystis ulmi) in parts of southern England have not followed the pattern of earlier occurrences, and continue to cause concern. Features of particular interest are the possible effects of the disease in reducing the range of botanical variation in the English elm, and the extent to which the distributions of elm species have themselves influenced the intensity and extent of the outbreaks. It is generally agreed that the major division of the English elms is between Ulmus glabra Huds. (Ug), native in the north of England and more sporadic in the south, and the Ulmus minor and Ulmus procera complex. Until recently, U. minor has been referred to as U. carpinifolia Glad., and, together with U. procera, is probably native to southern Europe. The presence of the two species in England, where they seldom set seed, is most easily explained by human introduction from late pre-Roman time onwards. U. minor and U. procera are usually distinguishable in England. Hybrids between U. glabra and U. minor are well known, and Richens1,2 has suggested that hybrids may also occur between U. procera and U. glabra as well as between U. minor and U. procera.
This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution
Access options
Subscribe to this journal
Receive 51 print issues and online access
$199.00 per year
only $3.90 per issue
Buy this article
- Purchase on Springer Link
- Instant access to full article PDF
Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Richens, R. H., Forestry, 38, 225 (1965).
Richens, R. H., Forestry, 40, 185 (1967).
Richens, R. H., Forestry, 32, 138 (1969).
Richens, R. H., Forestry, 34, 47 (1961).
Richens, R. H., Forestry, 34, 181 (1961).
Jeffers, J. N. R., and Richens, R. H., Silvae Genetica, 19, 1 (1970).
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
JEFFERS, J. Dutch Elm Disease and Botanical Variation in English Elm. Nature 236, 407–408 (1972). https://doi.org/10.1038/236407a0
Received:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/236407a0
Comments
By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.