Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Are the Astrophysical and Statistical Schools of Irreversibility Compatible ?

Abstract

A SERIOUS crisis at the foundations of natural sciences has been generated recently by the astrophysical school of thought1–4 which maintains that the origin of irreversibility and all time asymmetries observed in nature can be traced back to initial conditions which gave rise to the present expansion of the universe as a whole. The astrophysical school has been considered to be in serious contradiction to the more established statistical school5 which claims that irreversibility and time asymmetries originate in the nature of macroscopic observations; that is, in the macroscopic instrument which records information and which retains a record of it. I wish to show how both schools of thought are essentially compatible with each other in particular from a cosmological viewpoint of entropy-free thermodynamics4.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Hogarth, J., Proc. Roy. Soc., A, 267, 365 (1962).

    Article  ADS  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  2. Gold, T., Amer. J. Phys., 30, 403 (1962).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Narlikar, J. V., in The Nature of Time (edit. by Gold, T.), 25, 28, 62 (Cornell University Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  4. Gal-Or, B., in Critical Review of Thermodynamics (edit. by Stuart, E. B., Gal-Or, B., and Brainard, A. J.) (Mono Book Corporation, Baltimore, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  5. Rosenfeld, L., in The Nature of Time (edit. by Gold, T.) (Cornell University Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  6. Beauregard, O., Costa de, in Critical Review of Thermodynamics (edit. by Stuart, E. B., Gal-Or, B., and Brainard, A. J.) (Mono Book Corporation, Baltimore, 1970).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Bergmann, P. G., in Nature of Time (edit. by Gold, T.) (Cornell University Press, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Beauregard, O., Costa de, in Modern Developments of Thermodynamics (edit. by Gal-Or, B.) (Technion, in the press).

  9. Aharony, A., and Ne'eman, Y., Intern. J. Theoret. Phys., 3, 437 (1970).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  10. Landau, L. D., and Lifshitz, E. M., Statistical Physics, 26 (Addison-Wesley, Reading, Pennsylvania, 1969).

    Google Scholar 

  11. Prigogine, I., in Critical Review of Thermodynamics (edit. by Stuart, E.B., Gal-Or, B., and Brainard, A. J.), 1, 461 (Mono Book Corporation, Baltimore, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GAL-OR, B. Are the Astrophysical and Statistical Schools of Irreversibility Compatible ?. Nature 234, 217–218 (1971). https://doi.org/10.1038/234217a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/234217a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing