Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Trimodal Response of Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis to Penicillins

Abstract

IT has been generally believed that penicillins act on Gram-negative bacilli by interfering with cell wall synthesis leading to the release of spheroplasts which then succumb to osmotic damage. Such damage is usually fatal although in conditions of suitably high osmolarity the spheroplast phenomenon is known to be reversible1. Using turbidimetric methods supported by morphological studies in the scanning electron microscope, we have recently demonstrated that Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis show a variety of responses to penicillins which cannot be satisfactorily explained on the basis simply of the emergence and subsequent osmotic destruction of spheroplasts2,3. With the high bacterial population densities used, large numbers of “persisters” (organisms which survive exposure to bactericidal concentrations of penicillin although their progeny remain fully sensitive4) could be recovered after prolonged exposure to penicillins, and it seemed that this survival resulted from yet another response to the agents. In this investigation we have extended our studies and have attempted to elucidate the persister phenomenon.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lederberg, J., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 42, 574 (1956).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Greenwood, D., and O'Grady, F., J. Med. Microbiol., 2, 435 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Greenwood, D., and O'Grady, F., J. Infect. Dis. (in the press).

  4. Bigger, J. W., Lancet, ii, 497 (1944).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Watson, B. W., Gauci, C. L., Blache, L., and O'Grady, F., Phys. Med. Biol., 14, 555 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Taubeneck, U., Nature, 196, 195 (1962).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Guze, L. B., and Kalmanson, G. M., Science, 143, 1340 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Gunnison, J. B., Fraher, M. A., and Jawetz, E., J. Gen. Microbiol., 35, 335 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Kalmanson, G. M., Hubert, E. G., Montgomerie, J. Z., and Guze, L. B., Antimicrobial Agents and Chemotherapy, 304 (Amer. Soc. Microbiol., 1967).

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

GREENWOOD, D., O'GRADY, F. Trimodal Response of Escherichia coli and Proteus mirabilis to Penicillins. Nature 228, 457–458 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/228457a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/228457a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing