Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Differential Rejection of Neurones and Neuroglia in Canine Cardiac Allografts

Abstract

USING a free-grafting technique, Barnes1 demonstrated that brain tissue is at least as antigenic as skin allografts in mice. After the grafting procedure the neuronal cells become necrotic in his experiments, whereas the associated neuroglia, being more resistant to ischaemic anoxia, survived. A second-set form of rejection was found on subsequent skin grafting. He concluded that in this type of brain allograft, antigenicity is dependent on viable glial tissue. Such free-grafting experiments however, give no indication of the reactions invoked by viable neurones. An answer to this problem is important in the consideration of integrated neural allografting as in whole nerve, heart and brain grafts, for example.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barnes, A. D., Transplantation, 8, 379 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Mann, F. C., Priestley, J. T., Markowitz, J., and Yater, W. M., Arch. Surg., 26, 219 (1933).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Kosek, J., Hurley, E. J., and Lower, R. R., Lab. Invest., 19, 97 (1968).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SHARDEY, G., COOPER, E. & DE BOER, W. Differential Rejection of Neurones and Neuroglia in Canine Cardiac Allografts. Nature 228, 69–71 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/228069a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/228069a0

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing