Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Satellite DNAs in Crustacea: Two Different Components with the Same Density in Neutral CsCI Gradients

Abstract

SINCE the first reports of satellite DNAs in the Jonah crab, Cancer borealis1, and in the mouse2, satellite DNAs have been described for a number of animal species, both vertebrate and invertebrate. We now report our findings on the satellite DNAs of five species of Crustacea. We find at least one and in some instances two DNA satellites in each species and were surprised to discover that two distinctly different satellite DNAs band at the same density, 1.677 g/cm3, in CsC1. DNAs banding at this density are usually assumed to be “crab poly d(A–T)”, the satellite DNA composed of more than 90 per cent alternating adenylate and thymidylate residues3,4. It now seems that this cannot be assumed without further characterization of the DNA species having that density. We emphasize that the satellites described in this note are not mitochondrial in origin: even though we find a mitochondrial DNA of ρ = 1.688 g/cm3 in each of the five species, the quantity is too small to be detectable in a “total” DNA preparation. These data will be presented elsewhere.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Sueoka, N., J. Mol. Biol., 3, 31 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Kit, S., J. Mol. Biol., 3, 711 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Josse, A., Kaiser, A. D., and Kornberg, A., J. Biol. Chem., 236, 864 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Skinner, D. M., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 58, 103 (1967).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Marmur, J., J. Mol. Biol., 3, 208 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Flamm, W. G., Bond, H. E., and Burr, H. E., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 129, 310 (1906).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Graham, D. E., Anal. Biochem. (in the press).

  8. Smith, M., J. Mol. Biol., 9, 17 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Luck, D. J. L., and Reich, E., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 52, 931 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Klett, R. P., Chabot, I. M., Smith, M., and Hart, J. F. L., Canad. J. Biochem., 47, 829 (1969).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Counts, W. E., and Flamm, W. G., Biochim. Biophys. Acta, 114, 628 (1966).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Kirby, K. S., Biochem. J., 66, 495 (1957).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  13. Massie, H. R., and Zimm, B. H., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 54, 1641 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Massie, H. R., and Zimm, B. H., Proc. US Nat. Acad. Sci., 54, 1636 (1965).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Skinner, D. M., and Triplett, L., Biochem. Biophys. Res. Commun., 28, 892 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Morgan, A. R., and Wells, R. D., J. Mol. Biol., 37, 63 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schildkraut, C. L., Marmur, J., and Doty, P., J. Mol. Biol., 4, 430 (1962).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Mandel, M., Igambi, L., Bergendahl, J., Dodson, jun., M. L., and Schelgen, E., J. Bact., 101, 333 (1970).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

SKINNER, D., BEATTIE, W., KERR, M. et al. Satellite DNAs in Crustacea: Two Different Components with the Same Density in Neutral CsCI Gradients. Nature 227, 837–839 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/227837a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/227837a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing