Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Redshift and the Size of Double Radio Sources

Abstract

A RELATIONSHIP between redshift and the angular size of radio sources, particularly quasi-stellar sources, has been sought with limited success for some time. Miley1, for example, observed 72 quasi-stellar sources at 408 MHz and found that those with flat spectra and large redshift had on the average the highest fringe visibility. Bash2, however, concluded from observations of 234 radio sources at 2,695 MHz that while fringe visibility was related to spectra, no significant relation to redshift was evident.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Miley, G. K., Nature, 218, 933 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  2. Bash, F. N., Astrophys. J., 152, 375 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooper, B. F. C., Price, R. M., and Cole, D. J., Austral. J. Phys., 18, 589 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  4. Seielstad, G. A., Astrophys. J., 147, 24 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Hogg, D. C., Macdonald, R. G., Conway, R. G., and Wade, C. M., Astron. J., 74, 1206 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  6. Wade, C. M., Pub. Nat. Radio Astron. Obs., 1, 99 (1961).

    Google Scholar 

  7. Macdonald, G. H., Kenderdine, S., and Neville, A. C., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 138, 259 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  8. Mackay, C. D., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 145, 31 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  9. Ekers, R. D., Austral. J. Phys. Astrophys. Supp. No. 6 (1969).

  10. Hoerner, S. von, Astrophys. J., 144, 483 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogg, D. E., Astrophys. J., 155, 1099 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  12. Clark, B. G., and Hogg, D. E., Astrophys. J., 145, 21 (1966).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  13. Anderson, B., and Donaldson, W., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 137, 81 (1967).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  14. Clark, B. G., and Miley, G. K., Astrophys. Lett., 4, 207 (1969).

    ADS  Google Scholar 

  15. Mathews, T. A., Morgan, W. W., and Schmidt, M., Astrophys. J., 140, 35 (1964).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  16. Burbidge, G. R., and Burbidge, E. M., Nature, 222, 735 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  17. Petrosian, V., Astrophys. J., 155, 1029 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  18. Rees, M. J., and Setti, G., Nature, 219, 127 (1968).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  19. Christiansen, W., Mon. Not. Roy. Astron. Soc., 145, 327 (1969).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

LEGG, T. Redshift and the Size of Double Radio Sources. Nature 226, 65–67 (1970). https://doi.org/10.1038/226065a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Revised:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/226065a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing