Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Profiles of Activity in Rodents of Some Narcotic and Narcotic Antagonist Drugs

Abstract

THE narcotic analgesics and their antagonists form a series ranging from morphine, which is a powerful and highly addictive analgesic, to naloxone, which is a potent antagonist of morphine1. One of the drugs between these extremes is pentazocine, which has both analgesic and antimorphine properties. In man, pentazocine is an effective analgesic drug; but, unlike the narcotic analgesics, it does not support morphine dependence and it precipitates abstinence effects in persons dependent on morphine2. Unlike cyclazocine and nalorphine, pentazocine rarely causes hallucinations in man. These properties render pentazocine a useful analgesic of a new type; but tests in animals that show its profile of activity are not well developed. For example, pentazocine is poorly effective in antinociceptive tests based on mechanical pressure, in which morphine and other narcotic analgesics are active; whereas in the antinociceptive tests in animals in which pentazocine has proved effective3–8, it cannot clearly be distinguished from other narcotic antagonists not useful as analgesics in man (cyclazocine, levallorphan and nalorphine) nor from antipyretic analgesics, such as aspirin and mefenamic acid. We describe here new tests in rodents that we have devised to indicate those features of the activity of pentazocine that are important for its clinical usefulness in man.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kosterlitz, H. W., and Watt, A. J., Brit. J. Pharmacol. Chemother., 33, 266 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Fraser, H. F., and Harris, L. S., Ann. Rev. Pharmacol., 7, 277 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Taber, R. I., Greenhouse, D. D., and Irwin, S., Nature, 204, 189 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Blumberg, H., Wolf, P. S., and Dayton, H. B., Proc. Soc. Exp. Biol. and Med., 118, 763 (1965).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pearl, J., and Harris, L. S., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 154, 319 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Blane, G. F., J. Pharm. Pharmacol., 19, 367 (1967).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Collier, H. O. J., Dinneen, L. C., Johnson, C. A., and Schneider, C., Brit. J. Pharmacol. Chemother., 32, 295 (1968).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  8. Helfer, H., and Jaques, R., Helv. Physiol. Acta, 26, 137 (1968).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Keele, C. A., and Armstrong, D., Substances Producing Pain and Itch (Arnold, London, 1964).

    Google Scholar 

  10. Finney, D. J., Statistical Method in Biological Assay, second ed. (Griffin, London, 1964).

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  11. Green, A. F., Young, P. A., and Godfrey, E. I., Brit. J. Pharmacol. Chemother., 6, 572 (1951).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Collier, H. O. J., in Evaluation of Drug Activities: Pharmacometrics (edit. by Laurence, D. R., and Bacharach, A. L.), 183 (Academic Press, London and New York, 1964).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  13. Bianchi, C., and Franceschini, J., Brit. J. Pharmacol. Chemother., 9, 280 (1954).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Collier, H. O. J., Warner, B. T., and Skerry, R., Brit. J. Pharmacol. Chemother., 17, 28 (1961).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Straub, W., Deutsch. Med. Wschr., 37, 1462 (1911).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Shemano, I., and Wendel, H., Toxicol. Appl. Pharmacol., 6, 334 (1964).

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Schneider, C., Nature, 220, 586 (1968).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Winder, C. V., Welford, M., Wax, J., and Kaump, D. H., J. Pharmacol. Exp. Ther., 154, 161 (1966).

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

COLLIER, H., SCHNEIDER, C. Profiles of Activity in Rodents of Some Narcotic and Narcotic Antagonist Drugs. Nature 224, 610–612 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/224610a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/224610a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing