Skip to main content

Thank you for visiting nature.com. You are using a browser version with limited support for CSS. To obtain the best experience, we recommend you use a more up to date browser (or turn off compatibility mode in Internet Explorer). In the meantime, to ensure continued support, we are displaying the site without styles and JavaScript.

  • Letter
  • Published:

Comparison of the Sr/Ca Ratio of Fossil and Recent Mollusc Shells

Abstract

BIOCHEMICAL evolution has occurred in mollusc shells with respect to their Sr contents, according to Lowenstam1, and this thesis has subsequently been elaborated2,3. Contemporary forms are thought to be able to discriminate more efficiently than ancient molluscs against Sr relative to Ca in seawater, so that modern mollusc shells generally contain lower Sr/Ca ratios than ancient shells. Evidence for this is a systematic decrease in the Sr/Ca ratio in unrecrystallized aragonitic gastropod shells from the Pennsylvanian to present1 and in unrecrystallized aragonitic cephalopods from Carboniferous to present3. Hallam and Price3 do not seriously consider the possibility of post-depositional alteration of shells without recrystallization as an explanation for the observed relationship between the Sr/Ca ratio and age, and it may be that the Sr content of calcareous shell material is altered before recrystallization4–6. If so, it may be difficult to differentiate the role of biochemical evolution from post-depositional alterations caused by diagenesis or weathering.

This is a preview of subscription content, access via your institution

Access options

Buy this article

Prices may be subject to local taxes which are calculated during checkout

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Lowenstam, H. A., in Isotopic and Cosmic Chemistry (edit. by Craig, H.) (North-Holland Publishing Co., 1963).

    Google Scholar 

  2. Hallam, A., and Price, N. B., Nature, 212, 25 (1966).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Hallam, A., and Price, N. B., Geol. Mag., 105, 252 (1968).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Curtis, C. D., and Krinsley, D., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 29, 71 (1965).

    Article  ADS  Google Scholar 

  5. Pilkey, O. H., and Goodell, H. G., Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 75, 137 (1964).

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Dodd, J. R., J. Paleo., 41, 1313 (1967).

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Mack, C., Essentials of Statistics for Scientists and Technologists (Plenum Publishers, 1967).

    Google Scholar 

  8. Robie, R. A., in Handbook of Physical Constants (edit. by Clark, jun., S. P.), Geol. Soc. Amer. Mem., 97, 437 (1966).

    Book  Google Scholar 

  9. Holland, H. D., Borcsik, M., Munoz, J., and Oxburgh, U. M., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 27, 957 (1963).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Holland, H. D., Holland, H. J., and Munoz, J. L., Geochim. Cosmochim. Acta, 28, 1287 (1964).

    Article  ADS  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Oxburgh, U. M., Segnit, R. E., and Holland, H. D., Bull. Geol. Soc. Amer., 70, 1653 (1959).

    Google Scholar 

  12. Dobbins, D. A., thesis, University of North Carolina at Chapel Hill (1967).

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

RAGLAND, P., PILKEY, O. & BLACKWELDER, B. Comparison of the Sr/Ca Ratio of Fossil and Recent Mollusc Shells. Nature 224, 1223–1224 (1969). https://doi.org/10.1038/2241223a0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/2241223a0

This article is cited by

Comments

By submitting a comment you agree to abide by our Terms and Community Guidelines. If you find something abusive or that does not comply with our terms or guidelines please flag it as inappropriate.

Search

Quick links

Nature Briefing

Sign up for the Nature Briefing newsletter — what matters in science, free to your inbox daily.

Get the most important science stories of the day, free in your inbox. Sign up for Nature Briefing